Literature DB >> 19115245

Long-term results of quality of life after standard laparoscopic vs. robot-assisted laparoscopic fundoplications for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. A comparative clinical trial.

Jens Hartmann1, Charalambos Menenakos, Juergen Ordemann, Marc Nocon, Wieland Raue, Chris Braumann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of telematic surgical approach in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is still unclear.
METHODS: The aim of the study is to assess disease specific symptoms and quality of life in patients with GERD treated with either traditional laparoscopic (TL) or robot-assisted fundoplication using the Da Vinci system (DV) in long-term follow-up.
RESULTS: Eighty patients underwent a fundoplication in 2003. Four years later all patients were given a standardized questionnaire and 59 (74%) replied. The TL group included 44 patients (18 male/26 female) and the DV group 15 patients (9 male/6 female); the mean operating time was 116 min for the TL group and 207 min for the DV group (p < 0.001). The mean GIQLI score was 106 points for TL and 107 points in the DV (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Although a safe and feasible procedure, high functional costs of the Da Vinci system and longer operating time prevent this operation from being the standard surgical procedure for GERD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19115245     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  7 in total

Review 1.  Whether robot-assisted laparoscopic fundoplication is better for gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Mi; Yingxin Kang; Xiao Chen; Bingjun Wang; Zhiping Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robotic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Guoliang Yao; Kefeng Liu; Yonggang Fan
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Surgical treatment of GERD: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sophia K McKinley; Rebecca C Dirks; Danielle Walsh; Celeste Hollands; Lauren E Arthur; Noe Rodriguez; Joyce Jhang; Ahmed Abou-Setta; Aurora Pryor; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Bethany J Slater
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Randomized controlled trial of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication: 12 years follow-up.

Authors:  F Lang; A Huber; K F Kowalewski; H G Kenngott; F Billmann; A T Billeter; L Fischer; V V Bintintan; C N Gutt; B P Müller-Stich; F Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 5.  Robotic surgery: disruptive innovation or unfulfilled promise? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the first 30 years.

Authors:  Alan Tan; Hutan Ashrafian; Alasdair J Scott; Sam E Mason; Leanne Harling; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Evaluation of a robot-assisted video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery programme.

Authors:  Yong He; Amans Coonar; Sabin Gelvez-Zapata; Post Sastry; Archer Page
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Robotic Fundoplication for Large Paraesophageal Hiatal Hernias.

Authors:  Massimo Arcerito; Martin G Perez; Harpreet Kaur; Kenneth M Annoreno; John T Moon
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.