Literature DB >> 19114543

Efficacy of a vaccine based on protective antigen and killed spores against experimental inhalational anthrax.

Yves P Gauthier1, Jean-Nicolas Tournier, Jean-Charles Paucod, Jean-Philippe Corre, Michèle Mock, Pierre L Goossens, Dominique R Vidal.   

Abstract

Protective antigen (PA)-based anthrax vaccines acting on toxins are less effective than live attenuated vaccines, suggesting that additional antigens may contribute to protective immunity. Several reports indicate that capsule or spore-associated antigens may enhance the protection afforded by PA. Addition of formaldehyde-inactivated spores (FIS) to PA (PA-FIS) elicits total protection against cutaneous anthrax. Nevertheless, vaccines that are effective against cutaneous anthrax may not be so against inhalational anthrax. The aim of this work was to optimize immunization with PA-FIS and to assess vaccine efficacy against inhalational anthrax. We assessed the immune response to recombinant anthrax PA from Bacillus anthracis (rPA)-FIS administered by various immunization protocols and the protection provided to mice and guinea pigs infected through the respiratory route with spores of a virulent strain of B. anthracis. Combined subcutaneous plus intranasal immunization of mice yielded a mucosal immunoglobulin G response to rPA that was more than 20 times higher than that in lung mucosal secretions after subcutaneous vaccination. The titers of toxin-neutralizing antibody and antispore antibody were also significantly higher: nine and eight times higher, respectively. The optimized immunization elicited total protection of mice intranasally infected with the virulent B. anthracis strain 17JB. Guinea pigs were fully protected, both against an intranasal challenge with 100 50% lethal doses (LD(50)) and against an aerosol with 75 LD(50) of spores of the highly virulent strain 9602. Conversely, immunization with PA alone did not elicit protection. These results demonstrate that the association of PA and spores is very much more effective than PA alone against experimental inhalational anthrax.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19114543      PMCID: PMC2643630          DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01217-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  86 in total

1.  Fulminant meningitis due to Bacillus anthracis in 11-year-old girl during Ramadan.

Authors:  M Berthier; J L Fauchere; J Perrin; B Grignon; D Oriot
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-03-23       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Bacillus anthracis CapD, belonging to the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase family, is required for the covalent anchoring of capsule to peptidoglycan.

Authors:  Thomas Candela; Agnès Fouet
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Nasal immunization with a dual antigen anthrax vaccine induced strong mucosal and systemic immune responses against toxins and bacilli.

Authors:  Brian R Sloat; Zhengrong Cui
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Oral spore vaccine based on live attenuated nontoxinogenic Bacillus anthracis expressing recombinant mutant protective antigen.

Authors:  R Aloni-Grinstein; O Gat; Z Altboum; B Velan; S Cohen; A Shafferman
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Role of toxin functional domains in anthrax pathogenesis.

Authors:  F Brossier; M Weber-Levy; M Mock; J C Sirard
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Protective efficacy of a recombinant protective antigen against Bacillus anthracis challenge and assessment of immunological markers.

Authors:  B W McBride; A Mogg; J L Telfer; M S Lever; J Miller; P C Turnbull; L Baillie
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 7.  Anthrax vaccines.

Authors:  A M Friedlander; S L Welkos; B E Ivins
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.291

8.  Characterisation of adsorbed anthrax vaccine by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  G C Whiting; S Rijpkema; T Adams; M J Corbel
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Contribution of individual toxin components to virulence of Bacillus anthracis.

Authors:  C Pezard; P Berche; M Mock
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Contribution of immunological memory to protective immunity conferred by a Bacillus anthracis protective antigen-based vaccine.

Authors:  Hadar Marcus; Rachel Danieli; Eyal Epstein; Baruch Velan; Avigdor Shafferman; Shaul Reuveny
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  The Exosporium Layer of Bacterial Spores: a Connection to the Environment and the Infected Host.

Authors:  George C Stewart
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Noninvasive imaging technologies reveal edema toxin as a key virulence factor in anthrax.

Authors:  Fabien Dumetz; Grégory Jouvion; Huot Khun; Ian Justin Glomski; Jean-Philippe Corre; Clémence Rougeaux; Wei-Jen Tang; Michèle Mock; Michel Huerre; Pierre Louis Goossens
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Progress toward the Development of a NEAT Protein Vaccine for Anthrax Disease.

Authors:  Miriam A Balderas; Chinh T Q Nguyen; Austen Terwilliger; Wendy A Keitel; Angelina Iniguez; Rodrigo Torres; Frederico Palacios; Celia W Goulding; Anthony W Maresso
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Characterization of a multi-component anthrax vaccine designed to target the initial stages of infection as well as toxaemia.

Authors:  C K Cote; L Kaatz; J Reinhardt; J Bozue; S A Tobery; A D Bassett; P Sanz; S C Darnell; F Alem; A D O'Brien; S L Welkos
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 5.  Technical transformation of biodefense vaccines.

Authors:  Shan Lu; Shixia Wang
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies directed against defined linear epitopes on domain 4 of anthrax protective antigen.

Authors:  Cassandra D Kelly-Cirino; Nicholas J Mantis
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Immunization of mice with formalin-inactivated spores from avirulent Bacillus cereus strains provides significant protection from challenge with Bacillus anthracis Ames.

Authors:  James M Vergis; Christopher K Cote; Joel Bozue; Farhang Alem; Christy L Ventura; Susan L Welkos; Alison D O'Brien
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-10-31

Review 8.  Anthrax vaccination strategies.

Authors:  Robert J Cybulski; Patrick Sanz; Alison D O'Brien
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2009-09-01

Review 9.  Molecular motions as a drug target: mechanistic simulations of anthrax toxin edema factor function led to the discovery of novel allosteric inhibitors.

Authors:  Elodie Laine; Leandro Martínez; Daniel Ladant; Thérèse Malliavin; Arnaud Blondel
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 4.546

10.  Capsules, toxins and AtxA as virulence factors of emerging Bacillus cereus biovar anthracis.

Authors:  Christophe Brézillon; Michel Haustant; Susann Dupke; Jean-Philippe Corre; Angelika Lander; Tatjana Franz; Marc Monot; Evelyne Couture-Tosi; Gregory Jouvion; Fabian H Leendertz; Roland Grunow; Michèle E Mock; Silke R Klee; Pierre L Goossens
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2015-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.