Literature DB >> 19114394

Body composition: validity of segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis.

Joe LaForgia1, Simon Gunn, Robert T Withers.   

Abstract

Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) measures the impedance associated with passage of an alternating current through the body which is proportional to total body water (TBW) and therefore can provide expedient estimates of body composition. However, little validity information is available for commercially available bathroom scale type devices which perform whole body estimates from segmental (lower limb) measurements. This study therefore compared body composition estimates between a commercially available segmental BIA device (Tanita BC-532) and four compartment criterion values. Body composition of nine males and nine females (mean +/- SD: 37.7 +/- 18.7 yr; 170.7 +/- 5.3 cm; 68.38 +/- 9.7 kg) was determined via BIA and a four compartment model incorporating measures of body density, TBW and bone mineral mass. While the mean %BF and fat free mass (FFM) values for both methods were not significantly different, considerable intra-individual differences were observed. BIA values varied from the four compartment values by -3.0 to 4.4 %BF and -3.3 to 1.9 kg FFM. The BIA estimates of TBW were significantly different from the criterion measures and intraindividual differences displayed a large range (-0.6 to 3.6 kg). Significant underestimations of TBW via BIA are concerning given that this is the parameter initially established by this method. Furthermore, the BIA data resulted in a FFM hydration value of 68.5% which was significantly (p<0.001) lower than the four compartment value of 72.0%. In conclusion, the BIA device tested displayed poor individual accuracy for the estimation of body composition compared with a four compartment criterion method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19114394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0964-7058            Impact factor:   1.662


  6 in total

1.  Muscle strength and its relationship with skeletal muscle mass indices as determined by segmental bio-impedance analysis.

Authors:  Omid Alizadehkhaiyat; David H Hawkes; Graham J Kemp; Anthony Howard; Simon P Frostick
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Lack of agreement of in vivo raw bioimpedance measurements obtained from two single and multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance devices.

Authors:  Analiza M Silva; Catarina N Matias; Catarina L Nunes; Diana A Santos; Elisabetta Marini; Henry C Lukaski; Luís B Sardinha
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Assessment of clinical measures of total and regional body composition from a commercial 3-dimensional optical body scanner.

Authors:  Jonathan P Bennett; Yong En Liu; Brandon K Quon; Nisa N Kelly; Michael C Wong; Samantha F Kennedy; Dominic C Chow; Andrea K Garber; Ethan J Weiss; Steven B Heymsfield; John A Shepherd
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 7.643

4.  Developing a screening tool for sarcopenia in hospitalized geriatric patients: Estimation of appendicular skeletal muscle mass using bioelectrical impedance.

Authors:  Rachel R Deer; Leyla Akhverdiyeva; Yong-Fang Kuo; Elena Volpi
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 7.324

5.  Development of a model to estimate 24-hour urinary creatinine excretion.

Authors:  Linda M Gerber; Samuel J Mann
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Addressing the problem of inaccuracy of measured 24-hour urine collections due to incomplete collection.

Authors:  Samuel J Mann; Linda M Gerber
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.738

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.