Literature DB >> 19113803

ACCP: economic evaluations of clinical pharmacy services: 2001-2005.

Alexandra Perez, Fred Doloresco, James M Hoffman, Patrick D Meek, Daniel R Touchette, Lee C Vermeulen, Glen T Schumock.   

Abstract

The objectives of this review were to summarize and evaluate studies that measured the economic impact of clinical pharmacy services published between 2001 and 2005 (inclusive) and to provide guidance on methodologic considerations to individuals performing such research in the future. A systematic literature search using the MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts databases was conducted to identify published economic evaluations of clinical pharmacy services. Studies were screened and then randomly assigned to reviewers, who reassessed inclusion and exclusion criteria and abstracted prespecified data from each study. Among the many characteristics examined in each study were study design and type of economic evaluation, setting and type of clinical pharmacy service, study quality, and results. Ninety-three articles were included in the final analysis. These studies were published in 43 different journals, most of which (68 [73.1%]) were pharmacy-based. Most studies were performed in hospitals (40 [43.0%]), ambulatory care clinics or physician's offices (20 [21.5%]), or community pharmacies (16 [17.2%]). The most common types of clinical pharmacy services evaluated were general pharmacotherapeutic monitoring services (32 [34.4%]), target drug programs (27 [29%]), and disease state-management services (21 [22.6%]). Full economic evaluations were performed in just less than half (45 [48.4%]) of the studies, and a positive economic benefit associated with clinical pharmacy services was noted in 31 (69%) of the 45 studies. Among 15 studies reporting data necessary to determine a benefit:cost ratio, the pooled median value was 4.81:1-meaning that for every $1 invested in clinical pharmacy services, $4.81 was achieved in reduced costs or other economic benefits. The quality of studies varied widely, with less than one half considered to be good to fair (40 [43.0%]); however, the proportion of studies using appropriate study designs increased compared with previous reviews. Based on the evidence examined in this review, clinical pharmacy services continue to provide a significant return on investment, but improvements are still needed in the methods used to evaluate the economic impact of these services.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19113803     DOI: 10.1592/phco.29.1.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  28 in total

1.  The future role of pharmacists in primary care.

Authors:  C P Bradley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Clinical pharmacy services: from cost-effectiveness analysis to a productivity indicators model.

Authors:  Adria Nogueras; Maria Isabel Chinchilla Fernández; Fernando Martínez; Faus Maria Jose; José Manuel Martínez Sesmero; José Luis Poveda Andrés; Miguel Ángel Calleja
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2019-07-04

3.  Redesign of the Clinical Pharmacy Practice Model in a Tertiary Academic Hospital in Medellín, Colombia.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Botero Aguirre; Andrés Felipe Valencia Quintero; Elkyn Johan Granados Vega
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-06-30

4.  Should there be a cap on the number of patients under the care of a clinical pharmacist?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2012-07

Review 5.  Economic evaluations of clinical pharmacist interventions on hospital inpatients: a systematic review of recent literature.

Authors:  James Gallagher; Suzanne McCarthy; Stephen Byrne
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-09-14

Review 6.  A review of the methodological challenges in assessing the cost effectiveness of pharmacist interventions.

Authors:  Rachel A Elliott; Koen Putman; James Davies; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Perceived needs of pharmaceutical care services among healthcare professionals in South Korea: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Iyn-Hyang Lee; Sandy Jeong Rhie; Nam Kyung Je; Ki Yon Rhew; Eunhee Ji; Jung Mi Oh; Euni Lee; Jeong-Hyun Yoon
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-08-31

Review 8.  Medication review and reconciliation with cooperation between pharmacist and general practitioner and the benefit for the patient: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marlies M E Geurts; Jaap Talsma; Jacobus R B J Brouwers; Johan J de Gier
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  The Report of the 2019-2020 Professional Affairs Standing Committee: Pharmacist Integration with Primary Care Practices.

Authors:  Gina D Moore; Anne L Burns; Hannah Fish; Nidhi Gandhi; Clark Kebodeaux; Lisa M Meny; Anne Policastri; Kevin B Sneed; Andy Traynor; Alexis Vosooney; Lynette R Bradley-Baker
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  Impact of Clinical Pharmacist on the Pediatric Intensive Care Practice: An 11-Year Tertiary Center Experience.

Authors:  Sandeep Tripathi; Heidi M Crabtree; Karen R Fryer; Kevin K Graner; Grace M Arteaga
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.