Literature DB >> 19112583

Wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) distinguish between different scream types: evidence from a playback study.

Katie Elizabeth Slocombe1, Simon W Townsend, Klaus Zuberbühler.   

Abstract

When experiencing aggression from group members, chimpanzees commonly produce screams. These agonistic screams are graded signals and vary acoustically as a function of the severity of aggression the caller is facing. We conducted a series of field playback experiments with a community of wild chimpanzees in the Budongo Forest, Uganda, to determine whether individuals could meaningfully distinguish between screams given in different agonistic contexts. We compared six subjects' responses to screams given in response to severe and mild aggression. Subjects consistently discriminated between the two scream types. To address the possibility that the response differences were driven directly by the screams' peripheral acoustic features, rather than any attached social meaning, we also tested the subjects' responses to tantrum screams. These screams are given by individuals that experienced social frustration, but no physical threat, yet acoustically they are very similar to screams of victims of severe aggression. We found chimpanzees looked longer at severe victim screams than either mild victim screams or tantrum screams. Our results indicate that chimpanzees attend to the informational content of screams and are able to distinguish between different scream variants, which form part of a graded continuum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19112583     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-008-0204-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  18 in total

1.  Extent and limits of cooperation in animals.

Authors:  Dorothy L Cheney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The human socio-cognitive niche and its evolutionary origins.

Authors:  Andrew Whiten; David Erdal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Flexible usage and social function in primate vocalizations.

Authors:  Dorothy L Cheney; Robert M Seyfarth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Numerical assessment in the wild: insights from social carnivores.

Authors:  Sarah Benson-Amram; Geoff Gilfillan; Karen McComb
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Vocal contagion of emotions in non-human animals.

Authors:  Elodie F Briefer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Bonobos assign meaning to food calls based on caller food preferences.

Authors:  Gladez Shorland; Emilie Genty; Christof Neumann; Klaus Zuberbühler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Chimpanzees extract social information from agonistic screams.

Authors:  Katie E Slocombe; Tanja Kaller; Josep Call; Klaus Zuberbühler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Segmental concatenation of individual signatures and context cues in banded mongoose (Mungos mungo) close calls.

Authors:  David A W A M Jansen; Michael A Cant; Marta B Manser
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 7.431

9.  Auditory pre-experience modulates classification of affect intensity: evidence for the evaluation of call salience by a non-human mammal, the bat Megaderma lyra.

Authors:  Hanna B Kastein; Vinoth Ak Kumar; Sripathi Kandula; Sabine Schmidt
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Structural Classification of Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) Vocalizations.

Authors:  Maxime Garcia; Bruno Gingras; Daniel L Bowling; Christian T Herbst; Markus Boeckle; Yann Locatelli; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Ethology       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.