Susan L Murphy1. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, USA. sumurphy@umich.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Accelerometers are being increasingly used in studies of physical activity (PA) among older adults, however the use of these monitors requires some specialized knowledge and up-to-date information on technological innovations. The purpose of this review article is to provide researchers with a guide to some commonly-used accelerometers in order to better design and conduct PA research with older adults. METHODS: A literature search was conducted to obtain all available literature on commonly-used accelerometers in older adult samples with specific attention to articles discussing research design. RESULTS: The use of accelerometers in older adults requires a basic understanding of the type being used, rationale for their placement, and attention to calibration when needed. The updated technology in some monitors should make study conduct less difficult, however comparison studies of the newer versus the older generation models will be needed. CONCLUSIONS: Careful considerations for design and conduct of accelerometer research as outlined in this review should help to enhance the quality and comparability of future research studies.
OBJECTIVE: Accelerometers are being increasingly used in studies of physical activity (PA) among older adults, however the use of these monitors requires some specialized knowledge and up-to-date information on technological innovations. The purpose of this review article is to provide researchers with a guide to some commonly-used accelerometers in order to better design and conduct PA research with older adults. METHODS: A literature search was conducted to obtain all available literature on commonly-used accelerometers in older adult samples with specific attention to articles discussing research design. RESULTS: The use of accelerometers in older adults requires a basic understanding of the type being used, rationale for their placement, and attention to calibration when needed. The updated technology in some monitors should make study conduct less difficult, however comparison studies of the newer versus the older generation models will be needed. CONCLUSIONS: Careful considerations for design and conduct of accelerometer research as outlined in this review should help to enhance the quality and comparability of future research studies.
Authors: Maciej S Buchowski; Sandra F Simmons; Lauren E Whitaker; James Powers; Linda Beuscher; Leena Choi; T Alp Ikizler; Kong Chen; John F Shnelle Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2011-11-24
Authors: Melissa A Napolitano; Kelley E Borradaile; Beth A Lewis; Jessica A Whiteley; Jaime L Longval; Alfred F Parisi; Anna E Albrecht; Christopher N Sciamanna; John M Jakicic; George D Papandonatos; Bess H Marcus Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2010-08-17 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Flávia A C Wanderley; Gustavo Silva; Elisa Marques; José Oliveira; Jorge Mota; Joana Carvalho Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-03-06 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Jamie N Justice; Matteo Cesari; Douglas R Seals; Carol A Shively; Christy S Carter Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Yuan Feng; David Maislin; Brendan T Keenan; Thorarinn Gislason; Erna S Arnardottir; Bryndis Benediktsdottir; Julio A Chirinos; Raymond R Townsend; Bethany Staley; Francis M Pack; Andrea Sifferman; Allan I Pack; Samuel T Kuna Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2018-10-15 Impact factor: 4.062