Literature DB >> 19111551

Diagnosing mild enteropathy celiac disease: a randomized, controlled clinical study.

Kalle Kurppa1, Pekka Collin, Mervi Viljamaa, Katri Haimila, Päivi Saavalainen, Jukka Partanen, Kaija Laurila, Heini Huhtala, Kaija Paasikivi, Markku Mäki, Katri Kaukinen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The diagnostic criteria for celiac disease require small-bowel mucosal villous atrophy with crypt hyperplasia (Marsh III). However, mucosal damage develops gradually and patients may evince clinical symptoms before histologic changes appear. Endomysial antibodies are specific in predicting forthcoming villous atrophy. We hypothesized that patients with mild enteropathy but positive endomysial antibodies benefit from a gluten-free diet (GFD) similarly to patients with more severe enteropathy.
METHODS: Small-bowel endoscopy together with clinical evaluations was performed in all together 70 consecutive adults with positive endomysial antibodies. Of these, 23 had only mild enteropathy (Marsh I-II) and they were randomized either to continue on a gluten-containing diet or start a GFD. After 1 year, clinical, serologic, and histologic evaluations were repeated. A total of 47 participants had small-bowel mucosal lesions compatible with celiac disease (Marsh III), and these served as disease controls.
RESULTS: In the gluten-containing diet group (Marsh I-II) the small-bowel mucosal villous architecture deteriorated in all participants, and the symptoms and abnormal antibody titers persisted. In contrast, in the GFD group (Marsh I-II) the symptoms were alleviated, antibody titers decreased, and mucosal inflammation diminished equally to celiac controls (Marsh III). When the trial was completed, all participants chose to continue on a life-long GFD.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with endomysial antibodies benefit from a GFD regardless of the degree of enteropathy. The diagnostic criteria for celiac disease need re-evaluation: endomysial antibody positivity without atrophy belongs to the spectrum of genetic gluten intolerance, and warrants dietary treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19111551     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.11.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  70 in total

1.  Recent advances in celiac disease.

Authors:  Hugh James Freeman; Angeli Chopra; Michael Tom Clandinin; Alan Br Thomson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Antibodies in celiac disease: implications beyond diagnostics.

Authors:  Sergio Caja; Markku Mäki; Katri Kaukinen; Katri Lindfors
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 11.530

Review 3.  Microscopic enteritis: Bucharest consensus.

Authors:  Kamran Rostami; David Aldulaimi; Geoffrey Holmes; Matt W Johnson; Marie Robert; Amitabh Srivastava; Jean-François Fléjou; David S Sanders; Umberto Volta; Mohammad H Derakhshan; James J Going; Gabriel Becheanu; Carlo Catassi; Mihai Danciu; Luke Materacki; Kamran Ghafarzadegan; Sauid Ishaq; Mohammad Rostami-Nejad; A Salvador Peña; Gabrio Bassotti; Michael N Marsh; Vincenzo Villanacci
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Potential celiac disease in Indian patients.

Authors:  Marleena Repo; Kalle Kurppa
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 5.  Is enteroscopy necessary for diagnosis of celiac disease?

Authors:  Taylan Kav; Bulent Sivri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Nuclear fluorescence serum reactivity on monkey oesophagus: a new antibody for the follow-up of coeliac disease?

Authors:  A Picarelli; L Sabbatella; M Di Tola; M Silano; A Nicolussi; S D'Inzeo; A Coppa
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Intestinal titres of anti-tissue transglutaminase 2 antibodies correlate positively with mucosal damage degree and inversely with gluten-free diet duration in coeliac disease.

Authors:  A Tosco; R Auricchio; R Aitoro; D Ponticelli; M Primario; E Miele; V Rotondi Aufiero; V Discepolo; L Greco; R Troncone; M Maglio
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  The Oslo definitions for coeliac disease and related terms.

Authors:  Jonas F Ludvigsson; Daniel A Leffler; Julio C Bai; Federico Biagi; Alessio Fasano; Peter H R Green; Marios Hadjivassiliou; Katri Kaukinen; Ciaran P Kelly; Jonathan N Leonard; Knut Erik Aslaksen Lundin; Joseph A Murray; David S Sanders; Marjorie M Walker; Fabiana Zingone; Carolina Ciacci
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Flow cytometry of duodenal intraepithelial lymphocytes improves diagnosis of celiac disease in difficult cases.

Authors:  Julio Valle; José Mario T Morgado; Juan Ruiz-Martín; Antonio Guardiola; Miriam Lopes-Nogueras; Almudena García-Vela; Beatriz Martín-Sacristán; Laura Sánchez-Muñoz
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.623

10.  Increasing prevalence and high incidence of celiac disease in elderly people: a population-based study.

Authors:  Anitta Vilppula; Katri Kaukinen; Liisa Luostarinen; Ilkka Krekelä; Heikki Patrikainen; Raisa Valve; Markku Mäki; Pekka Collin
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.