Literature DB >> 19111479

Prosthetic carotid bypass grafts for atherosclerotic lesions: a prospective study of 198 consecutive cases.

J B Ricco1, C Marchand, J P Neau, E Marchand, J Cau, G Fébrer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the standard treatment for atherosclerotic lesions involving the carotid bifurcation. However, CEA can be challenging under some conditions. The goal of this study was to determine the outcome and durability of prosthetic carotid bypass grafting (PCB) with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts as an alternative to CEA.
METHODS: This is a prospective series of 198 consecutive patients with PCB, representing 12.4% of 1595 patients with a carotid reconstruction procedure performed in our department between September 1986 and December 2006. Qualifying event was stroke in 67 patients (34%) and transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in 45 (23%), and 86 patients (43%) were asymptomatic. Primary indications for PCB were extensive atherosclerotic lesions (n=71; 36%), carotid stenosis associated with kinking (n=49; 25%), recurrent stenosis (n=47; 23%), stenosis after radiation therapy (n=18; 9%) and technical failure of CEA (n=13; 7%), with excessive arterial wall thinning and perforation after endarterectomy (n=10) or intimal flap on completion digital angiography (n=3).
RESULTS: The combined stroke and death rate at 30 days were 0.5% (one stroke). Median follow-up was 9.5 years (interquartile range (IQR): 6.2-18.3 years). At 10 years, primary patency was 97.9+/-3.4%. Six PCBs (3.0%) became occluded during follow-up; one patient had a restenosis greater than 50% and 18 patients (9.1%) had a restenosis of less than 50%. Five patients had an ipsilateral stroke (one postoperative stroke, one at 103 days with a patent PCB and three related to occlusion of the PCB at 4, 13 and 15 years after the procedure). At 10 years, cumulative stroke-free survival was 98.4+/-3.2%, and cumulative survival was 78.8+/-7.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: PCB is a safe surgical alternative and is durable, with a low incidence of graft restenosis, when CEA seems hazardous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19111479     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  3 in total

1.  Endovascular treatment for restenosis of carotid venous bypass graft: a clinical case report.

Authors:  Alberto Bramucci; Claudio Bianchini Massoni; Roberto Menozzi; Alessandro Ucci; Enrico Epifani; Antonio Freyrie
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-04-30

2.  Ipsilateral carotid bypass outcomes in hostile neck anatomy.

Authors:  Andres Guerra; Ashish K Jain; Mark K Eskandari; Heron E Rodriguez
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Revascularization for failed carotid artery stenting in a patient with a rare vertebral artery anomaly.

Authors:  Jaiyeola Adeyemi; Mohamad Omar Hadied; Simpledeep Banipal; Yevgeniy Rits; Jeffrey Rubin
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2018-04-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.