Literature DB >> 19111221

Comparison of single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon-bone autografts.

Sung-Jae Kim1, Seung-Bae Jo, Praveen Kumar, Kyung-Soo Oh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare postoperative knee stability and functional scores between single- and double- bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with the use of quadriceps tendon-bone autografts at a 2-year follow-up.
METHODS: The records of 59 patients who had ACL reconstruction between January 2005 and April 2006 were analyzed retrospectively. Twenty-eight patients had single-bundle reconstruction (group S) and 31 received double-bundle reconstruction (group D). Ligament stability was assessed with the Lachman and pivot-shift tests and a KT-2000 arthrometer. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores were employed to evaluate the functional outcomes.
RESULTS: The postoperative mean side-to-side difference for group S was 2.64 mm and 1.79 mm for group D, a difference that was found to be statistically significant (P = .020). Regarding the pivot-shift test, 3 patients had grade 1+ and 1 patient had grade 2+ pivot-shift in group S, while no patients had abnormal pivot-shift in group D (P = .093). The patients who reported grade A or B on IKDC scores were 24 and 28 in group S and D, respectively (P > .1). On the questionnaire of the twisting activity, although statistical difference was not found between the groups, there was a trend toward more restriction in twisting activity in group S (P = .096). We found significant correlation between the twisting activity and instability questionnaire of the Lysholm score (Spearman coefficient, 0.737; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Double-bundle ACL reconstruction using quadriceps tendon-bone autografts provide less laxity (1.79 mm) than single-bundle ACL reconstruction (2.64 mm) as measured by the KT-2000. However, we could not find any significant differences in the functional measurements between the 2 groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19111221     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  16 in total

1.  MRI of double-bundle ACL reconstruction: evaluation of graft findings.

Authors:  Tommi Kiekara; Timo Järvelä; Heini Huhtala; Antti Paakkala
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Graft size after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Daniel Hensler; Motoko Miyawaki; Kenneth D Illingworth; Carola F van Eck; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Zhenxiang Zhang; Beibei Gu; Wei Zhu; Lixian Zhu
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-04-18

Review 4.  A systematic review of single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Carola F van Eck; Volker Musahl; Freddie H Fu; Jón Karlsson; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Tensile properties of a split quadriceps graft for ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  R Matthew Miller; Amir Ata Rahnemai-Azar; Levent Sürer; Fabio V Arilla; Freddie H Fu; Richard E Debski; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques using the quadriceps tendon.

Authors:  Donghwi Kim; Shigehiro Asai; Chan-Woong Moon; Sun-Chul Hwang; Sahnghoon Lee; Kenan Keklikci; Monica Linde-Rosen; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults.

Authors:  Thavatchai Tiamklang; Sermsak Sumanont; Thanit Foocharoen; Malinee Laopaiboon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

8.  Kinematic analysis of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hua-Wei Liu; Ming Ni; Guo-Qiang Zhang; Xiang Li; Hui Chen; Qiang Zhang; Wei Chai; Yong-Gang Zhou; Ji-Ying Chen; Yu-Liang Liu; Cheng-Kung Cheng; Yan Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 9.  Outcomes for primary anterior cruciate reconstruction with the quadriceps autograft: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jonathan S Mulford; Stephen E Hutchinson; Jacqueline R Hang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Is double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction superior to single-bundle? A comprehensive systematic review.

Authors:  Haukur Björnsson; Neel Desai; Volker Musahl; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Mohit Bhandari; Freddie Fu; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.