Literature DB >> 19109296

Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs.

S König1, H Simianer, A Willam.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare a conventional dairy cattle breeding program characterized by a progeny testing scheme with different scenarios of genomic breeding programs. The ultimate economic evaluation criterion was discounted profit reflecting discounted returns minus discounted costs per cow in a balanced breeding goal of production and functionality. A deterministic approach mainly based on the gene flow method and selection index calculations was used to model a conventional progeny testing program and different scenarios of genomic breeding programs. As a novel idea, the modeling of the genomic breeding program accounted for the proportion of farmers waiting for daughter records of genotyped young bulls before using them for artificial insemination. Technical and biological coefficients for modeling were chosen to correspond to a German breeding organization. The conventional breeding program for 50 test bulls per year within a population of 100,000 cows served as a base scenario. Scenarios of genomic breeding programs considered the variation of costs for genotyping, selection intensity of cow sires, proportion of farmers waiting for daughter records of genotyped young bulls, and different accuracies of genomic indices for bulls and cows. Given that the accuracies of genomic indices are greater than 0.70, a distinct economic advantage was found for all scenarios of genomic breeding programs up to factor 2.59, mainly due to the reduction in generation intervals. Costs for genotyping were negligible when focusing on a population-wide perspective and considering additional costs for herdbook registration, milk recording, or keeping of bulls, especially if there is no need for yearly recalculation of effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Genomic breeding programs generated a higher discounted profit than a conventional progeny testing program for all scenarios where at least 20% of the inseminations were done by genotyped young bulls without daughter records. Evaluation of levels of annual genetic gain for individual traits revealed the same potential for low heritable traits (h(2) = 0.05) compared with moderate heritable traits (h(2) = 0.30), preconditioning highly accurate genomic indices of 0.90. The final economic success of genomic breeding programs strongly depends on the complete abdication of any forms of progeny testing to reduce costs and generation intervals, but such a strategy implies the willingness of the participating milk producers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19109296     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  19 in total

1.  Genetic variances of SNP loci for milk yield in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Petr Pešek; Josef Přibyl; Luboš Vostrý
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Changes in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selection.

Authors:  Adriana García-Ruiz; John B Cole; Paul M VanRaden; George R Wiggans; Felipe J Ruiz-López; Curtis P Van Tassell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle.

Authors:  David Habier; Jens Tetens; Franz-Reinhold Seefried; Peter Lichtner; Georg Thaller
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Accuracy of direct genomic values in Holstein bulls and cows using subsets of SNP markers.

Authors:  Gerhard Moser; Mehar S Khatkar; Ben J Hayes; Herman W Raadsma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Efficiency of genomic selection in an established commercial layer breeding program.

Authors:  Florian Sitzenstock; Florence Ytournel; Ahmad R Sharifi; David Cavero; Helge Täubert; Rudolf Preisinger; Henner Simianer
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.

Authors:  Gerhard Moser; Bruce Tier; Ron E Crump; Mehar S Khatkar; Herman W Raadsma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Mehar S Khatkar; Gerhard Moser; Ben J Hayes; Herman W Raadsma
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 8.  Epigenetic marks: regulators of livestock phenotypes and conceivable sources of missing variation in livestock improvement programs.

Authors:  Eveline M Ibeagha-Awemu; Xin Zhao
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Linkage disequilibrium, persistence of phase and effective population size estimates in Hereford and Braford cattle.

Authors:  Patrícia Biegelmeyer; Claudia C Gulias-Gomes; Alexandre R Caetano; Juan P Steibel; Fernando F Cardoso
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 10.  Emerging Genomic Tools for Legume Breeding: Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Manish K Pandey; Manish Roorkiwal; Vikas K Singh; Abirami Ramalingam; Himabindu Kudapa; Mahendar Thudi; Anu Chitikineni; Abhishek Rathore; Rajeev K Varshney
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.