Literature DB >> 19108787

Milnacipran for the treatment of fibromyalgia in adults: a 15-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose clinical trial.

Daniel J Clauw1, Philip Mease, Robert H Palmer, R Michael Gendreau, Yong Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preclinical and clinical studies have suggested that milnacipran, a dual norepinephrine-serotonin reuptake inhibitor, may be efficacious in the treatment of fibromyalgia (FM).
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of milnacipran in treating the multiple domains of FM.
METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Adult patients (age 18-70 years) who met 1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria for FM were randomized to receive milnacipran 100 mg/d, milnacipran 200 mg/d, or placebo for 15 weeks. Because this was a pivotal registration trial, the primary end points were chosen to investigate efficacy for 2 potential indications: the treatment of FM and the treatment of FM pain. Thus, the 2 primary efficacy end points were rates of FM composite responders and FM pain composite responders. FM composite responders were defined as patients concurrently experiencing clinically meaningful improvements in the following 3 domain criteria: pain (> or = 30% improvement, as recorded in an electronic diary); patients' global status (a rating of very much improved or much improved on the Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC] scale); and physical function (a > or = 6-point improvement on the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36] Physical Component Summary score). FM pain composite responders were defined as those who met the pain and PGIC criteria. Adverse events reported by patients or observed by investigators were recorded throughout the trial.
RESULTS: Of 2270 patients screened, 1196 were randomized to receive milnacipran 100 mg/d (n = 399), milnacipran 200 mg/d (n = 396), or placebo (n = 401). The majority of patients were female (96.2%) and white (93.5%). The population had a mean age of 50.2 years, a mean baseline weight of 180.8 pounds, and a mean baseline body mass index of 30.6 kg/m(2). Compared with placebo, significantly greater proportions of milnacipran-treated patients were FM composite responders (100 mg/d: P = 0.01; 200 mg/d: P = 0.02) and FM pain composite responders (100 mg/d: P = 0.03; 200 mg/d: P = 0.004). Milnacipran was associated with significant improvements in pain after 1 week of treatment (100 mg/d: P = 0.004; 200 mg/d: P = 0.04), as well as significant improvements in multiple secondary efficacy end points, including global status (PGIC: P<0.001 for both doses), physical function (SF-36 physical functioning domain-100 mg/d: P < 0.001; 200 mg/d: P = 0.02), and fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory- 100 mg/d: P = 0.04). The most commonly reported adverse events with milnacipran were nausea (100 mg/d, 34.3%; 200 mg/d, 37.6%), headache (18.0% and 17.7%, respectively), and constipation (14.3% and 17.9%). Adverse events resulted in premature study discontinuation in 19.5% and 23.7% of those who received milnacipran 100 and 200 mg/d, respectively, compared with 9.5% of placebo recipients.
CONCLUSION: In these adult patients with FM, both doses of milnacipran (100 and 200 mg/d) were associated with significant improvements in pain and other symptoms. Clinical Trials Identification Number: NCT00098124.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19108787     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  67 in total

1.  Sustained pain reduction through affective self-awareness in fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael C Hsu; Howard Schubiner; Mark A Lumley; John S Stracks; Daniel J Clauw; David A Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Electronic Patient Diaries and Questionnaires - ePRO Now Delivering on the Promise?

Authors:  Brian Tiplady
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  ACS chemical neuroscience molecule spotlight on savella.

Authors:  Corey R Hopkins
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.418

4.  Effect of Milnacipran on Pain in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis with Widespread Pain: A Randomized Blinded Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Yvonne C Lee; Elena Massarotti; Robert R Edwards; Bing Lu; ChihChin Liu; Yuanyu Lo; Alyssa Wohlfahrt; Nancy D Kim; Daniel J Clauw; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group pilot study of milnacipran for chronic radicular pain (sciatica) associated with lumbosacral disc disease.

Authors:  David M Marks; Chi-Un Pae; Ashwin A Patkar
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2014-08-14

6.  Safety and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in fibromyalgia: a phase I/II proof of concept trial.

Authors:  Gudrun Lange; Malvin N Janal; Allen Maniker; Jennifer Fitzgibbons; Malusha Fobler; Dane Cook; Benjamin H Natelson
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 7.  Advances in the assessment of fibromyalgia.

Authors:  David A Williams; Stephen Schilling
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.670

8.  Sodium oxybate: a potential new pharmacological option for the treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome.

Authors:  Todd J Swick
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.346

9.  New drugs approved in 2009.

Authors:  Erin Sears; Sarah Brooks
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2010-04

10.  Role and rationale for the use of milnacipran in the management of fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Jay D Kranzler; R Michael Gendreau
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.