Literature DB >> 19106685

Ischemic complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prevention, and management.

Sébastien Gaujoux1, Alain Sauvanet, Marie-Pierre Vullierme, Alexandre Cortes, Safi Dokmak, Annie Sibert, Valérie Vilgrain, Jacques Belghiti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess prevalence, prevention, and management strategy of visceral ischemic complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
BACKGROUND: Ischemic complications after PD resulting from preexisting celiac axis (CA), superior mesenteric artery (SMA), stenosis, or intraoperative arterial trauma appear as an underestimated cause of death. Their prevention and adequate management are challenging.
METHODS: From 1995 to 2006, 545 PD were performed in our institution. All patients were evaluated by thin section multidetector computed tomography (CT) with arterial reconstruction to detect and class SMA or CA stenosis. Hemodynamical significance of stenosis was assessed preoperatively by arteriography for atherosclerotic stenosis and intraoperatively by gastroduodenal artery clamping test for CA compression by median arcuate ligament. Significant atherosclerotic stenosis was stented or bypassed, whereas CA compression was treated by median arcuate ligament division during PD. Multidetector-CT accuracy to detect arterial stenosis, results of revascularization procedures, and both prevalence and prognosis of ischemic complications after PD were analyzed.
RESULTS: Among 62 (11%) stenoses detected by multidetector-CT, 27 (5%) were hemodynamically significant, including 23 CA compressions by median arcuate ligament, 2 CA, and 2 SMA atherosclerotic stenoses, respectively. All atherosclerotic stenoses were successfully treated by preoperative stenting (n = 3) or bypass (n = 1). Among the 23 cases who underwent median arcuate ligament division, 3 (13%) failed due to 1 CA injury and 2 misdiagnosed intrinsic CA stenoses. Overall, 6 patients developed ischemic complications, due to intraoperative hepatic artery injury (n = 4), unrecognized SMA atherosclerotic stenosis (n = 1), or CA fibromuscular dysplasia (n = 1). Five (83%) of them died, representing 36% of the 14 deaths of the whole series (overall mortality = 2.6%). Overall, CT detected significant arterial stenosis with a 96% sensitivity and determined etiology of CA stenosis with a 92% accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: Ischemic complications are an underestimated cause of death after PD and are due to preexisting stenoses of CA and SMA, or intraoperative hepatic artery injury. Preexisting arterial stenoses are detected by routine multidetector CT. Preoperative endovascular stenting for intrinsic stenosis, division of median arcuate ligament for extrinsic compression, and meticulous dissection of the hepatic artery can contribute to minimize ischemic complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19106685     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181930249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  49 in total

1.  Image findings in celiac artery stenosis due to median arcuate ligament compression: a crucial diagnosis when planning for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Keli M Turner; Kunmi Majekodunmi; Alif Manejwala; David Neschis; Zina Novak; Cherif Boutros
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Reconstruction of the common hepatic artery at the time of total pancreatectomy using a splenohepatic bypass.

Authors:  Matthias H Seelig; Orlin Belyaev; Waldemar Uhl
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Feasibility and Safety of Spleno-Aortic Bypass in Patients with Atheromatous Celiac Trunk Stenosis in Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Tullio Piardi; Rami Rhaiem; Arman Aghei; Francesco Fleres; Yohann Renard; Ambroise Duprey; Daniele Sommacale; Reza Kianmanesh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Management of median arcuate ligament syndrome in patients who require pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Robert N Whistance; Vallari Shah; Emily R Grist; Clifford P Shearman; Neil W Pearce; Allan Odurny; Brian Stedman; Colin D Johnson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy: expected post-operative anatomy and complications.

Authors:  S H McEvoy; L P Lavelle; S M Hoare; A C O'Neill; F N Awan; D E Malone; E R Ryan; J W McCann; E J Heffernan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Tricks and tips in pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Anna Pallisera; Rafael Morales; Jose Manuel Ramia
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-09-15

7.  Recent advances and limitations of surgical treatment for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-10

8.  Binding versus conventional pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Léon Maggiori; Alain Sauvanet; Ganesh Nagarajan; Safi Dokmak; Béatrice Aussilhou; Jacques Belghiti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Five days of postoperative antimicrobial therapy decreases infectious complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients at risk for bile contamination.

Authors:  Isabelle Sourrouille; Sebastien Gaujoux; Guillaume Lacave; François Bert; Safi Dokmak; Jacques Belghiti; Catherine Paugam-Burtz; Alain Sauvanet
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  An innovative way of managing coeliac artery stenosis during pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  S Balakrishnan; S Kapoor; P Vijayanath; H Singh; A Nandhakumar; K Venkatesulu; V Shanmugam
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.