Literature DB >> 19104440

Retention of iodine and expression of biomarkers for renal damage in the kidney after application of iodinated contrast media in rats.

Gregor Jost1, Hubertus Pietsch, Janine Sommer, Peter Sandner, Philipp Lengsfeld, Peter Seidensticker, Stephan Lehr, Joachim Hütter, Martin A Sieber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Commercially available iodinated contrast media (CM) show significantly different physico-chemical properties. The relevance of the viscosity of CM may be underestimated as a contributing factor for clinically relevant renal failure as suggested by a large registry data analysis (Swedish registry study). The objective of this preclinical study is to assess differences of a low and high-viscous CM regarding their retention time in the kidney. Furthermore, we investigated the expression of marker genes for renal damage and hypoxia to evaluate a potential renal damage and hypoxia after application of iodinated CM.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: After application of Iopromide 300 and Iodixanol 320 CM, the iodine concentration over time was determined using computed tomography and x-ray fluorescence analysis in healthy Han Wistar and renally impaired ZSF1 rats. The latter served as a model for age and diabetes-related renal impairment. X-ray attenuation (Hounsfield units) in the renal cortex was analyzed by 2 independent blinded readers. Furthermore, the expression of kidney injury molecule 1 (Kim-1/Havcr1) and heme oxygenase I (HO-1/HMOX1) was measured by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain-reaction.
RESULTS: Computed tomography and x-ray fluorescence analysis in the kidneys of animals treated with Iodixanol revealed significantly prolonged retention of iodine in the kidney as compared with animals treated with Iopromide. This difference was even more pronounced in renally impaired rats. Twenty-four hours after Iodixanol treatment, significantly increased levels of Kim-1/Havcr1 and HO-1/HMOX1 transcript levels were observed compared with the saline and Iopromide treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: A prolonged retention of contrast media in the kidney was observed after administration of dimeric CM (Iodixanol 320). One possible explanation for this effect could be the high viscosity of the dimeric CM (Iodixanol 320) and the lack of dilution by osmotic diuresis. This prolonged exposure is possibly associated with higher renal toxicity as indicated by the elevated expression of biomarkers for hypoxia and renal injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19104440     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318190fbd2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of intrarenal oxygenation in iodinated contrast-induced acute kidney injury-susceptible rats by blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Lu-Ping Li; Jing Lu; Ying Zhou; Maria V Papadopoulou; Tammy Franklin; Ujala Bokhary; Richard Solomon; Anindya Sen; Pottumarthi V Prasad
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Persistent renal enhancement after intra-arterial versus intravenous iodixanol administration.

Authors:  Shinn-Huey Chou; Zhen J Wang; Jonathan Kuo; Miguel Cabarrus; Yanjun Fu; Rizwan Aslam; Judy Yee; Jeffrey M Zimmet; Kendrick Shunk; Brett Elicker; Benjamin M Yeh
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Iodinated contrast media cause direct tubular cell damage, leading to oxidative stress, low nitric oxide, and impairment of tubuloglomerular feedback.

Authors:  Zhi Zhao Liu; Kristin Schmerbach; Yuan Lu; Andrea Perlewitz; Tatiana Nikitina; Kathleen Cantow; Erdmann Seeliger; Pontus B Persson; Andreas Patzak; Ruisheng Liu; Mauricio M Sendeski
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2014-01-15

Review 4.  X-ray-computed tomography contrast agents.

Authors:  Hrvoje Lusic; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Cytotoxicity of local anesthetics and nonionic contrast agents on bovine intervertebral disc cells cultured in a three-dimensional culture system.

Authors:  Ana V Chee; Jing Ren; Brett A Lenart; Er-Yun Chen; Yejia Zhang; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 6.  Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy through a knowledge of its pathogenesis and risk factors.

Authors:  Michele Andreucci; Teresa Faga; Antonio Pisani; Massimo Sabbatini; Domenico Russo; Ashour Michael
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-11-30

7.  Simvastatin attenuates contrast-induced nephropathy through modulation of oxidative stress, proinflammatory myeloperoxidase, and nitric oxide.

Authors:  Ketab E Al-Otaibi; Abdulrahman M Al Elaiwi; Mohammad Tariq; Abdulrahman K Al-Asmari
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 6.543

8.  Development of a physiologically based computational kidney model to describe the renal excretion of hydrophilic agents in rats.

Authors:  Christoph Niederalt; Thomas Wendl; Lars Kuepfer; Karina Claassen; Roland Loosen; Stefan Willmann; Joerg Lippert; Marcus Schultze-Mosgau; Julia Winkler; Rolf Burghaus; Matthias Bräutigam; Hubertus Pietsch; Philipp Lengsfeld
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 9.  Contrast media viscosity versus osmolality in kidney injury: lessons from animal studies.

Authors:  Erdmann Seeliger; Diana C Lenhard; Pontus B Persson
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Contrast media: are there differences in nephrotoxicity among contrast media?

Authors:  Richard Solomon
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.