Literature DB >> 19104435

A virtual crossmatch protocol significantly increases access of highly sensitized patients to deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Adam W Bingaman1, Cathi L Murphey, Juan Palma-Vargas, Francis Wright.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with preexisting antihuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (sensitized patients) are more likely to have a positive crossmatch with possible donors and have a lower likelihood of receiving a renal transplant with longer wait times. A virtual crossmatch protocol using solid-phase technology to determine the specificity of anti-HLA antibodies may improve the probability of identifying a crossmatch-negative compatible donor and increase access of sensitized patients to kidney transplantation.
METHODS: A virtual crossmatch protocol was implemented on October 1, 2006 with solid-phase HLA antibody characterization for all sensitized patients on the waiting list. Transplant rates for the period from October 2006 to June 2008 were compared with Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data from 2006 to determine national transplant rates for sensitized patients.
RESULTS: SRTR data for 2006 showed that nationally 590 of 10,659 transplants (5.5%) were in-patients with panel reactive antibody (PRA) more than or equal to 80%. During 2006 to 2008, after initiation of the virtual crossmatch protocol, we performed 122 deceased donor kidney transplants, of which 15 (12.3%) sensitized patients (PRA>or=80%) received transplants (P=0.004 compared with SRTR national data), with 9 (7.4%) patients having a PRA more than 90%. The virtual crossmatch protocol was predictive of a negative-final crossmatch and eliminated the use of preliminary cross-matching with attendant cost savings of more than $100,000.
CONCLUSION: Initiation of a virtual crossmatch protocol using solid-phase histocompatibility techniques significantly increased access of sensitized patients to kidney transplantation and was more cost effective. Usage of a virtual crossmatch may facilitate greater sharing of kidneys to improve access to transplantation for sensitized recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19104435     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318191404c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  15 in total

1.  Revisiting traditional risk factors for rejection and graft loss after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  T B Dunn; H Noreen; K Gillingham; D Maurer; O G Ozturk; T L Pruett; R A Bray; H M Gebel; A J Matas
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Induction Therapies in Live Donor Kidney Transplantation on Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate With or Without Steroid Maintenance.

Authors:  Bekir Tanriover; Song Zhang; Malcolm MacConmara; Ang Gao; Burhaneddin Sandikci; Mehmet U S Ayvaci; Mutlu Mete; Demetra Tsapepas; Nilum Rajora; Prince Mohan; Ronak Lakhia; Christopher Y Lu; Miguel Vazquez
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Identification and therapeutic management of highly sensitized patients undergoing renal transplantation.

Authors:  Lu Huber; Nils Lachmann; Michael Dürr; Mareen Matz; Lutz Liefeldt; Hans-H Neumayer; Constanze Schönemann; Klemens Budde
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  The utility of second single antigen bead assay: Clearing the water or stirring up mud?

Authors:  Harold C Sullivan; Scott M Krummey; Howard M Gebel; Robert A Bray
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.850

Review 5.  Transplant immuno-diagnostics: crossmatch and antigen detection.

Authors:  Andrew M South; Paul C Grimm
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  A Prospective Randomised Paired Trial of Sirolimus versus Tacrolimus as Primary Immunosuppression following Non-Heart Beating Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  John Asher; Nikhil Vasdev; Hugh Wyrley-Birch; Colin Wilson; Naeem Soomro; David Rix; Bryon Jaques; Derek Manas; Nicholas Torpey; David Talbot
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2014-08-20

Review 7.  BSHI/BTS guidance on crossmatching before deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  S Peacock; D Briggs; M Barnardo; R Battle; P Brookes; C Callaghan; B Clark; C Collins; S Day; N Diaz Burlinson; P Dunn; R Fernando; S Fuggle; A Harmer; D Kallon; D Keegan; T Key; E Lawson; S Lloyd; J Martin; J McCaughan; D Middleton; F Partheniou; A Poles; T Rees; D Sage; E Santos-Nunez; O Shaw; M Willicombe; J Worthington
Journal:  Int J Immunogenet       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 2.385

8.  Virtual HLA Crossmatching as a Means to Safely Expedite Transplantation of Imported Pancreata.

Authors:  Brian C Eby; Robert R Redfield; Thomas M Ellis; Glen E Leverson; Abby R Schenian; Jon S Odorico
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Trends and impact on cold ischemia time and clinical outcomes using virtual crossmatch for deceased donor kidney transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Chethan M Puttarajappa; Dana Jorgensen; Jonathan G Yabes; Kwonho Jeong; Adriana Zeevi; John Lunz; Amit D Tevar; Michele Molinari; Sumit Mohan; Sundaram Hariharan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 18.998

10.  Different impact of pretransplant anti-HLA antibodies detected by Luminex in highly sensitized renal transplanted patients.

Authors:  Isabel Pérez-Flores; Jose Luis Santiago; Natividad Calvo-Romero; Alberto Barrientos-Guzmán; Ana Isabel Sánchez-Fructuoso
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.