Literature DB >> 19104408

Definitions of warm ischemic time when using controlled donation after cardiac death lung donors.

Bronwyn J Levvey1, Glen P Westall, Tom Kotsimbos, Trevor J Williams, Gregory I Snell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical limits and most relevant definition of warm ischemic time (WIT) for donation after cardiac death (DCD) donor lungs are unclear.
METHODS: Prospectively collected postwithdrawal and postmortem DCD donor hemodynamics and oximetry were temporally studied to determine the range, pattern, and potential clinical relevance to DCD clinical lung transplant outcomes. Different definitions of WIT were examined including the timing of withdrawal, systolic blood pressure less than 50 mm Hg, initiation of ventilation or the onset of pulmonary arterial flush. Intensive care unit donor management was strictly according to local practice guidelines.
RESULTS: Between May 2006 and August 2008, 24 DCD donor referrals led to 13 attempted lung retrievals, resulting in nine bilateral lung transplantions (three donors did not arrest within prescribed 90 min window and one donor had unacceptable lungs). The mean WIT for the 10 retrieved DCD lungs varied according to the different potential definitions and ranged from 10 to 42 min (absolute range, 3-65 min). Donor blood pressure, heart rate, and oximetry fell linearly from the time of withdrawal, leading to cardiac arrest on average 13.8 min later.
CONCLUSIONS: From a practical perspective, a WIT definition starting when systolic blood pressure is less than 50 mm Hg and finishing with cold arterial flush, provides the simplest, most universal definition that encompasses all important elements of warm ischemia. There is a need to prospectively collect data on all potential DCD lung donors and correlate these with clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19104408     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181901f24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  6 in total

Review 1.  Predicting time to death after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy.

Authors:  Laveena Munshi; Sonny Dhanani; Sam D Shemie; Laura Hornby; Genevieve Gore; Jason Shahin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Use and Outcomes of Kidneys from Donation after Circulatory Death Donors in the United States.

Authors:  John Gill; Caren Rose; Julie Lesage; Yayuk Joffres; Jagbir Gill; Kevin O'Connor
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 3.  Donors after cardiocirculatory death and lung transplantation.

Authors:  Ilhan Inci
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Donation after circulatory death and lung transplantation.

Authors:  Pedro Augusto Reck Dos Santos; Paulo José Zimermann Teixeira; Daniel Messias de Moraes Neto; Marcelo Cypel
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Lung Biomolecular Profile and Function of Grafts from Donors after Cardiocirculatory Death with Prolonged Donor Warm Ischemia Time.

Authors:  Francesca Gori; Jacopo Fumagalli; Caterina Lonati; Andrea Carlin; Patrizia Leonardi; Osvaldo Biancolilli; Antonello Rossetti; Ilaria Righi; Davide Tosi; Alessandro Palleschi; Lorenzo Rosso; Letizia Corinna Morlacchi; Francesco Blasi; Luigi Vivona; Gaetano Florio; Vittorio Scaravilli; Franco Valenza; Alberto Zanella; Giacomo Grasselli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 6.  Donation after circulatory death donors in lung transplantation.

Authors:  Thomas M Egan; Benjamin E Haithcock; Jason Lobo; Gita Mody; Robert B Love; John Jacob Requard; John Espey; Mir Hasnain Ali
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 3.005

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.