Michael I Harrison1, James Kimani. 1. Center for Delivery Organization & Markets, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland, USA. Michael.Harrison@ahrq.hhs.gov
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This article examines the development of transformation initiatives-deliberate attempts to achieve systemic changes and rapid performance improvements. Accounts of transformation initiatives often reveal little about past organizational and contextual conditions that contributed to success. Instead, these accounts concentrate on change barriers. PURPOSE: We seek to restore balance to this field by examining how antecedent system capacities contributed to a successful transformation initiative. METHODOLOGY: This article presents a case study of the first 2 years of a system redesign initiative at an integrated safety-net health system and provides a historical analysis of developments during the decade preceding the redesign. FINDINGS: Beginning in the mid-1990 s, Denver Health benefited from strong municipal support for its development and expansion. Gradually, it developed its financial and human resources, organizational structure, change strategy, change-management capabilities, information technology, and physical plant. These antecedent capacities all contributed to the implementation of the 2004 system redesign and helped Denver Health overcome several constraints. IMPLICATIONS: Transformation initiatives may build on existing features and resources, even as they overcome or depart from others. The Denver Health case study helps researchers identify positive antecedents to transformation initiatives, assess the success of such initiatives in terms of implementation progress and outcomes, and recognize complementary contributions of incremental and episodic changes. The study alerts practitioners to the importance of assuring that change efforts rest on solid organizational foundations.
BACKGROUND: This article examines the development of transformation initiatives-deliberate attempts to achieve systemic changes and rapid performance improvements. Accounts of transformation initiatives often reveal little about past organizational and contextual conditions that contributed to success. Instead, these accounts concentrate on change barriers. PURPOSE: We seek to restore balance to this field by examining how antecedent system capacities contributed to a successful transformation initiative. METHODOLOGY: This article presents a case study of the first 2 years of a system redesign initiative at an integrated safety-net health system and provides a historical analysis of developments during the decade preceding the redesign. FINDINGS: Beginning in the mid-1990 s, Denver Health benefited from strong municipal support for its development and expansion. Gradually, it developed its financial and human resources, organizational structure, change strategy, change-management capabilities, information technology, and physical plant. These antecedent capacities all contributed to the implementation of the 2004 system redesign and helped Denver Health overcome several constraints. IMPLICATIONS: Transformation initiatives may build on existing features and resources, even as they overcome or depart from others. The Denver Health case study helps researchers identify positive antecedents to transformation initiatives, assess the success of such initiatives in terms of implementation progress and outcomes, and recognize complementary contributions of incremental and episodic changes. The study alerts practitioners to the importance of assuring that change efforts rest on solid organizational foundations.
Authors: Courtney R Lyles; Margaret A Handley; Sara L Ackerman; Dean Schillinger; Pamela Williams; Marisa Westbrook; Gato Gourley; Urmimala Sarkar Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Brian C Martinson; David C Mohr; Martin P Charns; David Nelson; Emily Hagel-Campbell; Ann Bangerter; Hanna E Bloomfield; Richard Owen; Carol R Thrush Journal: AJOB Empir Bioeth Date: 2017-08-07
Authors: Allan Best; Trisha Greenhalgh; Steven Lewis; Jessie E Saul; Simon Carroll; Jennifer Bitz Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: Leti Vos; Sarah E Chalmers; Michel La Dückers; Peter P Groenewegen; Cordula Wagner; Godefridus G van Merode Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2011-01-19 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Brian C Martinson; David Nelson; Emily Hagel-Campbell; David Mohr; Martin P Charns; Ann Bangerter; Carol R Thrush; Joseph R Ghilardi; Hanna Bloomfield; Richard Owen; James A Wells Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Cheryl B Stetler; Judith A Ritchie; Jo Rycroft-Malone; Alyce A Schultz; Martin P Charns Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2009-11-30 Impact factor: 7.327