Literature DB >> 19103978

Does feigning amnesia impair subsequent recall?

Xue Sun1, Paawan V Punjabi, Lucy T Greenberg, John G Seamon.   

Abstract

Defendants who are accused of serious crimes sometimes feign amnesia to evade criminal responsibility. Previous research has suggested that feigning amnesia might impair subsequent recall. In two experiments, participants read and heard a story about a central character, described as "you," who was responsible for the death of either a puppy (Experiment 1) or a friend (Experiment 2). On free and cued recall tests immediately after the story, participants who had feigned amnesia recalled less than did participants who had recalled accurately. One week later, when all participants recalled accurately, participants who had previously feigned amnesia still performed worse than did participants who had recalled accurately both times. However, the participants who had formerly feigned amnesia did not perform worse than did a control group who had received only the delayed recall tests. Our results suggest that a "feigned amnesia effect" may reflect nothing more than differential practice at recall. Feigning amnesia for a crime need not impair memory for that crime when a person later seeks to remember accurately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19103978     DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.1.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  6 in total

1.  Symptom validity testing of feigned amnesia for a mock crime.

Authors:  Marko Jelicic; Harald Merckelbach; Saskia Van Bergen
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.813

2.  Total retrieval time and hypermnesia: investigating the benefits of multiple recall tests.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-05-28

3.  Failures to find suppression of episodic memories in the think/no-think paradigm.

Authors:  John B Bulevich; Henry L Roediger; David A Balota; Andrew C Butler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-12

4.  Amnesia and crime. How much do we really know?

Authors:  D L Schacter
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1986-03

Review 5.  Ironic processes of mental control.

Authors:  D M Wegner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Discriminating between simulated malingering and closed head injury on the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised.

Authors:  L C Bernard; M J McGrath; W Houston
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.813

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Memory for child sexual abuse information: simulated memory error and individual differences.

Authors:  Kelly McWilliams; Gail S Goodman; Kristen E Lyons; Jeremy Newton; Elizabeth Avila-Mora
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-01

2.  Do reminders of the crime reverse the memory-undermining effect of simulating amnesia?

Authors:  I Mangiulli; T Lanciano; K van Oorsouw; M Jelicic; A Curci
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-10

3.  Research on the Effects of Lying on Memory: A Scientometric Analysis and a Call for New Studies.

Authors:  Fabiana Battista; Henry Otgaar
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-24

4.  Feigning Amnesia Moderately Impairs Memory for a Mock Crime Video.

Authors:  Ivan Mangiulli; Kim van Oorsouw; Antonietta Curci; Harald Merckelbach; Marko Jelicic
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.