M Mangset1, E Berge, R Førde, J Nessa, T B Wyller. 1. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Ullevaal University Hospital, University of Oslo, NO-0407 Oslo, Norway. margrete.mangset@medisin.uio.no
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thrombolytic drugs to treat an acute ischaemic stroke reduce the risk of death or major disability. The treatment is, however, also associated with an increased risk of potentially fatal intracranial bleeding. This confronts the patient with the dilemma of whether or not to take a risk of a serious side effect in order to increase the likelihood of a favourable outcome. OBJECTIVE: To explore acute stroke patients' perception of risk and willingness to accept risks associated with thrombolytic drug treatment. DESIGN: Eleven patients who had been informed about thrombolytic drug treatment and had been through the process of deciding whether or not to participate in a thrombolytic drug trial went through repeated qualitative, semistructured interviews. RESULTS: Many patients showed a limited perception of the risks connected with thrombolytic drug treatment. Some perceived the risk as not relevant to them and were reluctant to accept that treatment could cause harm. Others seemed to be aware that treatment would mean exposure to risk. The patients' willingness to take a risk also varied substantially. Several statements revealed ambiguity and confusion about being involved in a decision about treatment. The patients' reasoning about risk was put into the context of their health-related experiences and life histories. Several patients wanted the doctor to be responsible for the decisions. CONCLUSION: Acute stroke patients' difficulties in perceiving and processing information about risk may reduce their ability to be involved in clinical decisions where risks are involved.
BACKGROUND: Thrombolytic drugs to treat an acute ischaemic stroke reduce the risk of death or major disability. The treatment is, however, also associated with an increased risk of potentially fatal intracranial bleeding. This confronts the patient with the dilemma of whether or not to take a risk of a serious side effect in order to increase the likelihood of a favourable outcome. OBJECTIVE: To explore acute strokepatients' perception of risk and willingness to accept risks associated with thrombolytic drug treatment. DESIGN: Eleven patients who had been informed about thrombolytic drug treatment and had been through the process of deciding whether or not to participate in a thrombolytic drug trial went through repeated qualitative, semistructured interviews. RESULTS: Many patients showed a limited perception of the risks connected with thrombolytic drug treatment. Some perceived the risk as not relevant to them and were reluctant to accept that treatment could cause harm. Others seemed to be aware that treatment would mean exposure to risk. The patients' willingness to take a risk also varied substantially. Several statements revealed ambiguity and confusion about being involved in a decision about treatment. The patients' reasoning about risk was put into the context of their health-related experiences and life histories. Several patients wanted the doctor to be responsible for the decisions. CONCLUSION:Acute strokepatients' difficulties in perceiving and processing information about risk may reduce their ability to be involved in clinical decisions where risks are involved.
Authors: Pierre-Antoine Gourraud; Roland G Henry; Bruce A C Cree; Jason C Crane; Antoine Lizee; Marram P Olson; Adam V Santaniello; Esha Datta; Alyssa H Zhu; Carolyn J Bevan; Jeffrey M Gelfand; Jennifer S Graves; Douglas S Goodin; Ari J Green; H-Christian von Büdingen; Emmanuelle Waubant; Scott S Zamvil; Elizabeth Crabtree-Hartman; Sarah Nelson; Sergio E Baranzini; Stephen L Hauser Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Darren Flynn; Daniel J Nesbitt; Gary A Ford; Peter McMeekin; Helen Rodgers; Christopher Price; Christian Kray; Richard G Thomson Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2015-02-07 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Victoria M Scicluna; Sara F Goldkind; Andrea R Mitchell; Rebecca D Pentz; Candace D Speight; Robert Silbergleit; Neal W Dickert Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Loraine Busetto; Johanna Hoffmann; Christina Stang; Hemasse Amiri; Fatih Seker; Jan Purrucker; Peter Arthur Ringleb; Simon Nagel; Martin Bendszus; Wolfgang Wick; Christoph Gumbinger Journal: Int J Integr Care Date: 2022-02-21 Impact factor: 5.120