Literature DB >> 19103942

"Two per cent isn't a lot, but when it comes to death it seems quite a lot anyway": patients' perception of risk and willingness to accept risks associated with thrombolytic drug treatment for acute stroke.

M Mangset1, E Berge, R Førde, J Nessa, T B Wyller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thrombolytic drugs to treat an acute ischaemic stroke reduce the risk of death or major disability. The treatment is, however, also associated with an increased risk of potentially fatal intracranial bleeding. This confronts the patient with the dilemma of whether or not to take a risk of a serious side effect in order to increase the likelihood of a favourable outcome.
OBJECTIVE: To explore acute stroke patients' perception of risk and willingness to accept risks associated with thrombolytic drug treatment.
DESIGN: Eleven patients who had been informed about thrombolytic drug treatment and had been through the process of deciding whether or not to participate in a thrombolytic drug trial went through repeated qualitative, semistructured interviews.
RESULTS: Many patients showed a limited perception of the risks connected with thrombolytic drug treatment. Some perceived the risk as not relevant to them and were reluctant to accept that treatment could cause harm. Others seemed to be aware that treatment would mean exposure to risk. The patients' willingness to take a risk also varied substantially. Several statements revealed ambiguity and confusion about being involved in a decision about treatment. The patients' reasoning about risk was put into the context of their health-related experiences and life histories. Several patients wanted the doctor to be responsible for the decisions.
CONCLUSION: Acute stroke patients' difficulties in perceiving and processing information about risk may reduce their ability to be involved in clinical decisions where risks are involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19103942     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2007.023192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  7 in total

Review 1.  Patient values and preferences in decision making for antithrombotic therapy: a systematic review: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Samantha MacLean; Sohail Mulla; Elie A Akl; Milosz Jankowski; Per Olav Vandvik; Shanil Ebrahim; Shelley McLeod; Neera Bhatnagar; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Precision medicine in chronic disease management: The multiple sclerosis BioScreen.

Authors:  Pierre-Antoine Gourraud; Roland G Henry; Bruce A C Cree; Jason C Crane; Antoine Lizee; Marram P Olson; Adam V Santaniello; Esha Datta; Alyssa H Zhu; Carolyn J Bevan; Jeffrey M Gelfand; Jennifer S Graves; Douglas S Goodin; Ari J Green; H-Christian von Büdingen; Emmanuelle Waubant; Scott S Zamvil; Elizabeth Crabtree-Hartman; Sarah Nelson; Sergio E Baranzini; Stephen L Hauser
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  The use of formal and informal knowledge sources in patients' treatment decisions in secondary stroke prevention: qualitative study.

Authors:  Josephine M E Gibson; Caroline L Watkins
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Development of a computerised decision aid for thrombolysis in acute stroke care.

Authors:  Darren Flynn; Daniel J Nesbitt; Gary A Ford; Peter McMeekin; Helen Rodgers; Christopher Price; Christian Kray; Richard G Thomson
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Determinants of Patient and Surrogate Experiences With Acute Care Research Consent: A Key Informant Interview Study.

Authors:  Victoria M Scicluna; Sara F Goldkind; Andrea R Mitchell; Rebecca D Pentz; Candace D Speight; Robert Silbergleit; Neal W Dickert
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Patient Pathways During Acute in-Hospital Stroke Treatment: A Qualitative Multi-Method Study.

Authors:  Loraine Busetto; Johanna Hoffmann; Christina Stang; Hemasse Amiri; Fatih Seker; Jan Purrucker; Peter Arthur Ringleb; Simon Nagel; Martin Bendszus; Wolfgang Wick; Christoph Gumbinger
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 5.120

7.  Surgeons' and methodologists' perceptions of utilising an expertise-based randomised controlled trial design: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jonathan A Cook; Marion K Campbell; Katie Gillies; Zoë Skea
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.