OBJECTIVES: In January 2007, opt-out HIV testing replaced provider-initiated testing at the sexually transmitted infections (STI) outpatient clinic in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The effect of the opt-out strategy on the uptake of HIV testing was studied and factors associated with refusal of HIV testing were identified. STUDY DESIGN: Data routinely collected at the STI clinic were analysed separately for men who have sex with men (MSM) and heterosexuals. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with opting out. RESULTS: In 2007, 12% of MSM and 4% of heterosexuals with (presumed) negative or unknown HIV serostatus declined HIV testing. Refusals gradually decreased to 7% and 2% by the year end. In 2006, before the introduction of opt-out, 38% of MSM and 27% of heterosexuals declined testing. The proportion of HIV-positive results remained stable among MSM, 3.4% in 2007 versus 3.7% in 2006, and among heterosexuals, 0.2% in 2007 versus 0.3% in 2006. In both groups factors associated with opting out were: age >or=30 years, no previous HIV test, the presence of STI-related complaints and no risky anal/vaginal intercourse. Among heterosexuals, men and non-Dutch visitors refused more often; among MSM, those warned of STI exposure by sexual partners and those diagnosed with gonorrhoea or syphilis refused more often. CONCLUSIONS: An opt-out strategy increased the uptake of HIV testing. A sharp increase in testing preceeded a more gradual increase, suggesting time must pass to optimise the new strategy. A small group of visitors, especially MSM, still opt out. Counselling will focus on barriers such as fear and low risk perception among high-risk visitors considering opting out.
OBJECTIVES: In January 2007, opt-out HIV testing replaced provider-initiated testing at the sexually transmitted infections (STI) outpatient clinic in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The effect of the opt-out strategy on the uptake of HIV testing was studied and factors associated with refusal of HIV testing were identified. STUDY DESIGN: Data routinely collected at the STI clinic were analysed separately for men who have sex with men (MSM) and heterosexuals. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with opting out. RESULTS: In 2007, 12% of MSM and 4% of heterosexuals with (presumed) negative or unknown HIV serostatus declined HIV testing. Refusals gradually decreased to 7% and 2% by the year end. In 2006, before the introduction of opt-out, 38% of MSM and 27% of heterosexuals declined testing. The proportion of HIV-positive results remained stable among MSM, 3.4% in 2007 versus 3.7% in 2006, and among heterosexuals, 0.2% in 2007 versus 0.3% in 2006. In both groups factors associated with opting out were: age >or=30 years, no previous HIV test, the presence of STI-related complaints and no risky anal/vaginal intercourse. Among heterosexuals, men and non-Dutch visitors refused more often; among MSM, those warned of STI exposure by sexual partners and those diagnosed with gonorrhoea or syphilis refused more often. CONCLUSIONS: An opt-out strategy increased the uptake of HIV testing. A sharp increase in testing preceeded a more gradual increase, suggesting time must pass to optimise the new strategy. A small group of visitors, especially MSM, still opt out. Counselling will focus on barriers such as fear and low risk perception among high-risk visitors considering opting out.
Authors: Alexandra Blenkinsop; Mélodie Monod; Ard van Sighem; Nikos Pantazis; Daniela Bezemer; Eline Op de Coul; Thijs van de Laar; Christophe Fraser; Maria Prins; Peter Reiss; Godelieve J de Bree; Oliver Ratmann Journal: Elife Date: 2022-08-03 Impact factor: 8.713
Authors: Joseph D Tucker; Li-Gang Yang; Bin Yang; Darwin Young; Gail E Henderson; Shu-Jie Huang; He-Kun Lu; Xiang-Sheng Chen; Myron S Cohen Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: J Womack; E Herieka; M Gompels; S Callaghan; E Burt; C F Davies; M T May; N O'Brien; J Macleod Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 2.341
Authors: John M Saunders; Catherine H Mercer; Lorna J Sutcliffe; Graham J Hart; Jackie Cassell; Claudia S Estcourt Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Anouk T Urbanus; Anneke van den Hoek; Albert Boonstra; Robin van Houdt; Lotte J de Bruijn; Titia Heijman; Roel A Coutinho; Maria Prins Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Luuk Gras; Suzanne Jurriaans; Margreet Bakker; Ard van Sighem; Daniela Bezemer; Christophe Fraser; Joep Lange; Jan M Prins; Ben Berkhout; Frank de Wolf Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-10-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Maud M A Verscheijden; Petra J Woestenberg; Hannelore M Götz; Maaike G van Veen; Femke D H Koedijk; Birgit H B van Benthem Journal: Emerg Themes Epidemiol Date: 2015-08-28