E G Klein1, J L Forster, D J Erickson, L A Lytle, B Schillo. 1. Health Behavior Health Promotion Division, Ohio State University College of Public Health, 456 Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. eklein@cph.osu.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While clean indoor air (CIA) policies are intended to reduce exposure to second-hand smoke in the workplace, restrictions in public workplaces have the potential to discourage youth smoking. There is growing evidence from cross-sectional and ecological studies, but limited evidence from longitudinal studies that this is so. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between local CIA policies and smoking behaviours among Minnesota youth over time. DESIGN, SETTING AND SUBJECTS: A cohort of 4233 Minnesota youths, ages 11 to 16 at baseline, was interviewed via telephone for 6 years (2000-2006). Individual, family and community level variables were collected from participants every 6 months. A generalised estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between CIA policies and past-month smoking in youth over time. The analysis was controlled for potential confounders at individual and community levels. RESULTS: There was not significant association between CIA policies and youth smoking behaviours in the multivariate analyses. At the individual level, parental smoking significantly increased the odds of smoking nearly 40% and close friend smoking increased the odds of past-month smoking by nearly 100% for each close friend. Banning smoking in the home was significantly associated with a 12% reduction in the odds of past-month smoking. CONCLUSION: After accounting for other community and individual level factors known to be associated with youth smoking, there was no significant association between CIA policies and past-month smoking for youth over time.
BACKGROUND: While clean indoor air (CIA) policies are intended to reduce exposure to second-hand smoke in the workplace, restrictions in public workplaces have the potential to discourage youth smoking. There is growing evidence from cross-sectional and ecological studies, but limited evidence from longitudinal studies that this is so. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between local CIA policies and smoking behaviours among Minnesota youth over time. DESIGN, SETTING AND SUBJECTS: A cohort of 4233 Minnesota youths, ages 11 to 16 at baseline, was interviewed via telephone for 6 years (2000-2006). Individual, family and community level variables were collected from participants every 6 months. A generalised estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between CIA policies and past-month smoking in youth over time. The analysis was controlled for potential confounders at individual and community levels. RESULTS: There was not significant association between CIA policies and youth smoking behaviours in the multivariate analyses. At the individual level, parental smoking significantly increased the odds of smoking nearly 40% and close friend smoking increased the odds of past-month smoking by nearly 100% for each close friend. Banning smoking in the home was significantly associated with a 12% reduction in the odds of past-month smoking. CONCLUSION: After accounting for other community and individual level factors known to be associated with youth smoking, there was no significant association between CIA policies and past-month smoking for youth over time.
Authors: Paul L Reiter; Mary E Wewers; Electra D Paskett; Elizabeth G Klein; Mira L Katz Journal: Rural Remote Health Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 1.759
Authors: Matthew C Farrelly; Brett R Loomis; Beth Han; Joe Gfroerer; Nicole Kuiper; G Lance Couzens; Shanta Dube; Ralph S Caraballo Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Cindy Tworek; Ryoko Yamaguchi; Deborah D Kloska; Sherry Emery; Dianne C Barker; Gary A Giovino; Patrick M O'Malley; Frank J Chaloupka Journal: Health Policy Date: 2010-05-18 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Elizabeth D Nesoff; Adam J Milam; Lee R Bone; Frances A Stillman; Mieka J Smart; Kathleen S Hoke; C Debra M Furr-Holden Journal: J Ethn Subst Abuse Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 1.507
Authors: Kate Goldade; Kelvin Choi; Debra H Bernat; Elizabeth G Klein; Kolawole S Okuyemi; Jean Forster Journal: Prev Med Date: 2012-01-08 Impact factor: 4.018