Literature DB >> 19103269

Investigating social discrimination of group members by laying hens.

Siobhan M Abeyesinghe1, Morven A McLeman, Rachael C Owen, Claire E McMahon, Christopher M Wathes.   

Abstract

Social relationships in domestic fowl are commonly assumed to rely on social recognition and its pre-requisite, discrimination of group-mates. If this is true, then the unnatural physical and social environments in which commercial laying hens are typically housed, when compared with those in which their progenitor species evolved, may compromise social function with consequent implications for welfare. Our aims were to determine whether adult hens can discriminate between unique pairs of familiar conspecifics, and to establish the most appropriate method for assessing this social discrimination. We investigated group-mate discrimination using two learning tasks in which there was bi-directional exchange of visual, auditory and olfactory information. Learning occurred in a Y-maze task (p<0.003; n=7/8) but not in an operant key-pecking task (p=0.001; n=1/10). A further experiment with the operant-trained hens examined whether failure was specific to the group-mate social discrimination or to the response task. Learning also failed to occur in this familiar/unfamiliar social discrimination task (p=0.001; n=1/10). Our findings demonstrate unequivocally that adult laying hens kept in small groups, under environmental conditions more consistent with those in which sensory capacities evolved, can discriminate group members: however, appropriate methods to demonstrate discrimination are crucial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19103269     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  5 in total

1.  The looks matter; aggression escalation from changes on phenotypic appearance in the domestic fowl.

Authors:  Irene Campderrich; Guiomar Liste; Inma Estevez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Factors Influencing Individual Variation in Farm Animal Cognition and How to Account for These Statistically.

Authors:  Emily V Bushby; Mary Friel; Conor Goold; Helen Gray; Lauren Smith; Lisa M Collins
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-08-17

3.  Why Do Hens Pile? Hypothesizing the Causes and Consequences.

Authors:  Helen Gray; Rachel Davies; Ashleigh Bright; Ann Rayner; Lucy Asher
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-12-10

4.  Low-rank Gallus gallus domesticus chicks are better at transitive inference reasoning.

Authors:  Jonathan Niall Daisley; Giorgio Vallortigara; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-12-09

Review 5.  Sophisticated Fowl: The Complex Behaviour and Cognitive Skills of Chickens and Red Junglefowl.

Authors:  Laura Garnham; Hanne Løvlie
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.