| Literature DB >> 19102760 |
Emil Segatto1, Carsten Lippold, András Végh.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective of this epidemiological study is to map the dentofacial anomalies that can be correlated to the two most frequent spinal diseases responsible for postural abnormalities and that can be clinically identified by the orthodontic examination.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19102760 PMCID: PMC2637865 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-169
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Figure 1Distribution of the MSCH and SC groups based on severity.
Figure 2Cephalometric analysis.
Frequency of the sagittal occlusal anomalies on the posterior region.
| Parameters | Scheuermann's disease group | Scoliosis group | Control group | |
| Normal molar occlusion | unilateral | 30.43 | 28.56 | 16.17 |
| bilateral | 47.74 | 57.12 | 64.68 | |
| Distal molar occlusion | unilateral | 30.43 | 28.56 | 8.82 |
| bilateral | 21.73 | 10.07 | 16.17 | |
| Mesial molar occlusion | unilateral | ~ | ~ | 7.35 |
| bilateral | ~ | 3.57 | 2.94 | |
Figure 3Means of the overjet values.
Comparison of the occlusal characteristics of the frontal region (Student's t-test).
| Parameters | Scheuermann's disease group | Scoliosis group | Control group | |||
| severe type | moderate type | severe type | moderate type | Student | ||
| 4.27 ± 3.973 | 0.001** | |||||
| Overjet | 3.25 ± 2.188 | 2.21 ± 1.201 | 0.040* | |||
| mean ± SD (mm) | 2.74 ± 1.851 | 0.143 | ||||
| 2.55 ± 1.509 | 0.438 | |||||
| 4.27 ± 3.150 | 0.039* | |||||
| Overbite | 2.75 ± 3.195 | 3.10 ± 1.585 | 0.601 | |||
| mean ± SD (mm) | 2.58 ± 2.168 | 0.245 | ||||
| 2.78 ± 1.715 | 0.568 | |||||
| 1.43 ± 0.724 | 0.125 | |||||
| Midline deviation | 1.67 ± 1.061 | 1.47 ± 0.898 | 0.347 | |||
| mean ± SD (mm) | 2.08 ± 1.121 | 0.049* | ||||
| 1.76 ± 0.972 | 0.597 | |||||
* – significant
** – highly significant
Cephalometric measurements in Scheuermann's disease and scoliosis group.
| Direction of the measurement | Parameters | Scheuermann's disease group | Scoliosis group | ||||||
| Mean | SD | Min. | Max. | Mean | SD | Min. | Max. | ||
| Sagittal | Maxillary depth (MD) | 91.31 | 3.87 | 80.80 | 100.90 | 91.83 | 3.15 | 85.80 | 97.70 |
| Ramus position (RP) | 73.80 | 4.98 | 59.00 | 82.30 | 74.84 | 2.91 | 68.00 | 82.90 | |
| Vertical | Facial axis (FA) | 86.31 | 3.62 | 78.20 | 91.80 | 86.50 | 4.92 | 78.40 | 100.20 |
| Lower facial height (LFH) | 39.50 | 4.17 | 30.50 | 50.10 | 39.35 | 5.22 | 27.70 | 50.30 | |
| Mandibular plane angle (MP) | 22.97 | 5.80 | 14.30 | 33.40 | 21.01 | 5.62 | 10.10 | 30.80 | |
Figure 4Means of the ovebite values.
Figure 5Lateral movement ranges.
Comparison of the asymmetry indicators characteristic to the examined orthopedic patient groups (Student's t-test).
| Parameters | Scheuermann's disease group | Scoliosis group | ||||
| mean | SD | mean | SD | Student | ||
| Condylar height | Left | 5.47 | 2.040 | 6.27 | 1.881 | 0.154 (NS) |
| (mm) | Right | 5.97 | 2.016 | 6.10 | 1.537 | 0.799 (NS) |
| Ramus height | Left | 54.12 | 5.281 | 49.74 | 4.681 | 0.003* |
| (mm) | Right | 52.10 | 5.761 | 49.03 | 4.460 | 0.036* |
| Condylar+ramus height | Left | 59.49 | 5.428 | 55.85 | 4.832 | 0.015* |
| (mm) | Right | 58.07 | 5.565 | 55.12 | 4.858 | 0.049* |
* – significant
NS – non significant
Asymmetry indexes of the mandible in different orthopedic groups.
| Asymmetry index | Scheuermann's disease group | Scoliosis group | ||
| [(R-L)/(R+L)]x100 | severe type | moderate type | severe type | moderate type |
| Condylar index mean ± SD | 12.02 ± 11.32 | 11.06 ± 17.02 | 12.45 ± 8.53 | 12.24 ± 10.79 |
| Ramal index mean ± SD | 3.16 ± 2.18 | 2.47 ± 5.35 | 3.32 ± 3.18 | 1.72 ± 0.89 |
| Condylar+ramal index mean ± SD | 2.66 ± 2.25 | 1.54 ± 2.44 | 2.58 ± 2.41 | 0.56 ± 0.47 |