Literature DB >> 19102598

Divergent cognitive costs for online forms of reappraisal and distraction.

Gal Sheppes1, Nachshon Meiran.   

Abstract

The present study was set out to evaluate the cognitive costs of two major emotion regulation strategies under conditions of increased challenge. Previous studies have established that cognitive reappraisal (construing an emotional event in nonemotional terms) has no cognitive costs. However, in all of these studies, reappraisal was initiated at the emotional situation onset, before emotional response tendencies sufficiently evolved. In the present study, the challenge of regulation strategies was increased by initiating strategies online at a late time point in an emotional situation. Applying this procedure revealed for the first time a cognitive cost for reappraisal and also provided double dissociation between reappraisal and another major cognitive emotion regulation strategy--distraction (diverting attention from an emotional situation via producing neutral thoughts). Specifically, late reappraisal, relative to distraction, resulted in an expenditure of self control resources. Late distraction but not reappraisal impaired memory encoding of the emotional situation. 2008 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19102598     DOI: 10.1037/a0013711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  52 in total

1.  Does Looking at the Positive Mean Feeling Good? Age and Individual Differences Matter.

Authors:  Derek M Isaacowitz; Soo Rim Noh
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2011-08-01

2.  Relative effectiveness of reappraisal and distraction in regulating emotion in late-life depression.

Authors:  Moria J Smoski; Kevin S LaBar; David C Steffens
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.105

3.  Age differences in managing response to sadness elicitors using attentional deployment, positive reappraisal and suppression.

Authors:  Monika Lohani; Derek M Isaacowitz
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2013-11-08

4.  Working memory load reduces the late positive potential and this effect is attenuated with increasing anxiety.

Authors:  Annmarie MacNamara; Jamie Ferri; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Emotional intensity influences pre-implementation and implementation of distraction and reappraisal.

Authors:  Roni Shafir; Naama Schwartz; Jens Blechert; Gal Sheppes
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Self-Focused Emotions and Ethical Decision-Making: Comparing the Effects of Regulated and Unregulated Guilt, Shame, and Embarrassment.

Authors:  Cory Higgs; Tristan McIntosh; Shane Connelly; Michael Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Electrocortical evidence of increased post-reappraisal neural reactivity and its link to depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Muhammad A Parvaz; Scott J Moeller; Rita Z Goldstein; Greg H Proudfit
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Mental illness and well-being: an affect regulation perspective.

Authors:  James J Gross; Helen Uusberg; Andero Uusberg
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 9.  Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-12-14

10.  Habitual reappraisal in context: peer victimisation moderates its association with physiological reactivity to social stress.

Authors:  Kara A Christensen; Amelia Aldao; Margaret A Sheridan; Katie A McLaughlin
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2015-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.