Literature DB >> 19102428

Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the use of 3.5-mm and 4.8-mm staples in gastric surgery.

Chikara Kunisaki1, Hirochika Makino, Ryo Takagawa, Naoto Yamamoto, Yasuhiko Nagano, Shoichi Fujii, Takashi Kosaka, Hidetaka A Ono, Hirotoshi Akiyama, Hiroshi Shimada.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the use of 4.8-mm and 3.8-mm staples in gastric resection.
METHODOLOGY: A series of 60 patients underwent distal or proximal gastrectomy. A 4.8-mm GIA universal stapler was randomly assigned for use in 50% of the patients and a 3.5-mm GIA universal stapler was assigned for use in the remaining 50%.
RESULTS: Bleeding was observed in 20 patients (12 in the 4.8-mm group and eight in the 3.5-mm group). In the 4.8-mm group, bleeding was less frequent in patients with a stomach wall thickness of 7.0-9.0mm. In the 3.5-mm group, bleeding was less frequent in patients with a stomach wall thickness of 5.0-7.0mm. Inappropriate staple formation was observed in patients with thick stomach walls in each group.
CONCLUSIONS: The appropriate staple size for gastric surgery may depend on the thickness of the stomach wall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19102428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  2 in total

1.  Division of the stomach and checking haemostasis for performing sleeve gastrectomy. Points of controversy.

Authors:  Radwan Kassir; Pierre Blanc; Imed Ben Amor; Patrice Lointier; Tarek Debs; Antonio Iannelli; Jean Gugenheim
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Investigation of Fundus Wall Thickness and Staple Height-an Observational Cohort Study : Fundus Wall Thickness and Leaks.

Authors:  Clara Boeker; Julian Mall; Christian Reetz; Kamil Yamac; Ludwig Wilkens; Christine Stroh; Hinrich Koehler
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.129

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.