Literature DB >> 19101335

Biomechanics of coronary artery and bypass graft disease: potential new approaches.

Lindsay C H John1.   

Abstract

The contribution of biomechanical factors to the incidence and distribution of coronary artery and bypass graft disease is underrecognized. This review examined the literature to determine which factors were relevant and the evidence for their importance. It identified two primary biomechanical factors that predispose to disease: (1) low-wall shear stress and (2) high-wall mechanical stress or strain. A range of secondary biomechanical factors have also been identified and include: vessel geometry; vessel movement; vessel wall characteristics and the presence of reflection waves. Potential surgical approaches for minimizing these effects are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19101335     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  12 in total

1.  Impact of top end anastomosis design on patency and flow stability in coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Sachi Koyama; Tadashi Kitamura; Keiichi Itatani; Tadashi Yamamoto; Shohei Miyazaki; Norihiko Oka; Kouki Nakashima; Tetsuya Horai; Minoru Ono; Kagami Miyaji
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Cell layer-electrospun mesh composites for coronary artery bypass grafts.

Authors:  Josh D Erndt-Marino; Silvia Becerra-Bayona; Rebecca E McMahon; Aaron S Goldstein; Mariah S Hahn
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Structural and Functional Differences Between Porcine Aorta and Vena Cava.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Mattson; Yanhang Zhang
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 4.  Role of smooth muscle cells in coronary artery bypass grafting failure.

Authors:  Kerry Wadey; Joshua Lopes; Michelle Bendeck; Sarah George
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 10.787

5.  Comparisons of planar and tubular biaxial tensile testing protocols of the same porcine coronary arteries.

Authors:  Joseph T Keyes; Danielle R Lockwood; Urs Utzinger; Leonardo G Montilla; Russell S Witte; Jonathan P Vande Geest
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 6.  Coronary remodeling and biomechanics: Are we going with the flow in 2020?

Authors:  Patricia E McCallinhart; Benjamin W Scandling; Aaron J Trask
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Impact of competitive flow on hemodynamics in coronary surgery: numerical study of ITA-LAD model.

Authors:  Jinli Ding; Youjun Liu; Feng Wang; Fan Bai
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  Influences of Geometric Configurations of Bypass Grafts on Hemodynamics in End-to-Side Anastomosis.

Authors:  Jae-Sung Choi; Sung Chul Hong; Hyuck Moon Kwon; Sang-Ho Suh; Jeong Sang Lee
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-04-14

Review 9.  Angiography-Based 4-Dimensional Superficial Wall Strain and Stress: A New Diagnostic Tool in the Catheterization Laboratory.

Authors:  Xinlei Wu; Masafumi Ono; Hideyuki Kawashima; Eric K W Poon; Ryo Torii; Atif Shahzad; Chao Gao; Rutao Wang; Peter Barlis; Clemens von Birgelen; Johan H C Reiber; Christos V Bourantas; Shengxian Tu; William Wijns; Patrick W Serruys; Yoshinobu Onuma
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-06-18

10.  The Tissue-Engineered Vascular Graft-Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Samand Pashneh-Tala; Sheila MacNeil; Frederik Claeyssens
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 6.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.