Literature DB >> 19101244

Echocardiographic parameters of mechanical synchrony in healthy individuals.

Cristina Conca1, Francesco Fulvio Faletra, Chinami Miyazaki, Jae Oh, Antonio Mantovani, Catherine Klersy, Antonio Sorgente, Giovanni Battista Pedrazzini, Elena Pasotti, Tiziano Moccetti, Angelo Auricchio.   

Abstract

Definition and validation of the ranges of normal values and agreement among echocardiographic measures of mechanical synchrony in healthy subjects are mostly lacking. The aims of this study were (1) to assess the ranges of normal values for 5 tissue Doppler imaging parameters, real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic measures, and speckle-tracking measures of mechanical synchrony; (2) to evaluate interinstitutional variability; (3) to compare the ranges of normal values with those reported in previous research; and (4) to analyze the agreement among all parameters in the same healthy subject. Time to peak systolic velocity (Ts), the delay between Ts at the basal septal and lateral segments, peak velocity difference, strain derived by tissue Doppler imaging, Ts derived by tissue synchronization imaging, systolic synchrony index (SSI) derived by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography, and longitudinal and radial strain derived by speckle tracking were prospectively collected and analyzed at 2 different institutions in 160 consecutive healthy subjects. The ranges of normal values, expressed as means +/- 2 SDs, were 30.32 +/- 29.36 ms for the SD of Ts, 15.51 +/- 99.88 ms for septal-lateral delay, 60.75 +/- 81.62 ms for peak velocity difference, 33.07 +/- 29.96 ms for tissue synchronization imaging, 34.16 +/- 23.26 ms for the SD of strain, 2.74 +/- 2.16% for SSI, 28.91 +/- 23.02 ms for the SD of longitudinal strain, and 10.4 +/- 6.31 ms for radial strain. There was large interinstitutional variability for all parameters. Three-dimensional SSI and radial strain were within the published upper range limit for healthy subjects. Ninety percent of healthy subjects were consistently classified to be synchronous by 1 parameter. With a composite index, more subjects than expected showed dyssynchrony (10% vs 2.5%). In conclusion, 3-dimensional SSI and radial strain were the most reproducible parameters and consistently discriminated normal healthy subjects from the cardiac resynchronization therapy volume responders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19101244     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.08.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  14 in total

Review 1.  Current and future role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Francisco Leyva; Paul W X Foley
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography: Its usefulness in current practice and potential future applications.

Authors:  Deepanjan Mitra; Sandip Basu
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-10-28

3.  Right ventricular mechanics using a novel comprehensive three-view echocardiographic strain analysis in a normal population.

Authors:  Daniel Forsha; Niels Risum; P Andrea Kropf; Sudarshan Rajagopal; P Brian Smith; Ronald J Kanter; Zainab Samad; Peter Sogaard; Piers Barker; Joseph Kisslo
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Influence of percutaneous atrial septal defect closure on inter- and intra-ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in adults: evaluation of strain pattern.

Authors:  Qi-Zhe Cai; Yu Liang; Zhen-Hui Zhu; Xiu-Zhang Lu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  How to improve outcomes: should we put more emphasis on programming and medical care and less on patient selection?

Authors:  Laszlo Buga
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 6.  Mechanical dyssynchrony and deformation imaging in patients with functional mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Isabella Rosa; Claudia Marini; Stefano Stella; Francesco Ancona; Marco Spartera; Alberto Margonato; Eustachio Agricola
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-26

7.  Development and validation of a clinical index to predict survival after cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  F Leyva; P W X Foley; B Stegemann; J A Ward; L L Ng; M P Frenneaux; F Regoli; R E A Smith; A Auricchio
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Francisco Leyva
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Association of left ventricular diastolic function with systolic dyssynchrony: a population study.

Authors:  Tatiana Kuznetsova; Petronille Bogaert; Malgorzata Kloch-Badelek; Daisy Thijs; Lutgard Thijs; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Imaging synchrony.

Authors:  Elias H Botvinick; J William O'Connell; Nitish Badhwar
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.