Literature DB >> 19101148

In vivo kinematic determination of total knee arthroplasty from squatting to standing.

Fei Liu1, Toshihiro Ohdera, Hirohide Miyamoto, Ray C Wasielewski, Richard D Komistek, Mohamed R Mahfouz.   

Abstract

This study analyzed three dimensional (3D) in vivo kinematic data from the squatting to standing position for 18 Japanese subjects (18 knees) implanted with either Legacy((R)) Posterior Stabilized (LPS) Flex Fixed Bearing TKA or LPS Flex Mobile Bearing TKA. Under weight-bearing conditions, for all patients, the average roll-forward motions for the medial and lateral condyles were 4.0+/-3.6 mm and 6.3+/-3.4 mm, and the average external axial rotation was 3.1 degrees +/-4.1 degrees . For both groups, the weight-bearing range-of-motion (ROM) (110.7 degrees +/-12.7 degrees ) was less than pre (127.2+/-15.5 degrees ) and post (135.6+/-5.4 degrees ) operative non-weight bearing ROM. As hypothesized, the incidence, average and maximum lift off for the squatting to standing activity were much less than those of deep knee bend (DKB), and condylar motions and kinematics were opposite that of the DKB. There was little statistical difference of their kinematic patterns during this activity between the LPS fixed and mobile TKA implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19101148     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  6 in total

1.  Mobility of the rotating platform in low contact stress knee arthroplasty is durable.

Authors:  Arthur Zürcher; Kim van Hutten; Jaap Harlaar; Ruud Pöll
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  In vivo Kinematics of the Knee after a Posterior Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison between Caucasian and South Korean Patients.

Authors:  Ji-Hoon Bae; Ali Hosseini; Kyung-Wook Nha; Sang-Eun Park; Tsung Yuan Tsai; Young-Min Kwon; Guoan Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2016-06-01

Review 3.  No differences between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B L Fransen; D C van Duijvenbode; M J M Hoozemans; B J Burger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  In vivo kinematics comparison of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty during deep knee bending motion.

Authors:  Xiaojun Shi; Bin Shen; Jing Yang; Pengde Kang; Zongke Zhou; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  In vivo kinematics of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty during deep knee bending under weight-bearing conditions.

Authors:  Kazuma Futai; Tetsuya Tomita; Takaharu Yamazaki; Masashi Tamaki; Hideki Yoshikawa; Kazuomi Sugamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Does mobile-bearing have better flexion and axial rotation than fixed-bearing in total knee arthroplasty? A randomised controlled study based on gait.

Authors:  Yi-Ming Zeng; Meng-Ning Yan; Hui-Wu Li; Jun Zhang; You Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 5.191

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.