Literature DB >> 19101076

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: surgical technique and experience with the first 99 cases.

Antje Feicke1, Martin Baumgartner, Scherwin Talimi, Daniel Max Schmid, Hans-Helge Seifert, Michael Müntener, Markus Fatzer, Tullio Sulser, Räto T Strebel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date, there is still a paucity of data in the literature on robotic-assisted laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection (RALEPLND) in patients with prostate cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the technical feasibility of RALEPLND and to present our surgical technique. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From April 2006 to March 2008, we performed RALEPLND in 99 patients prior to robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Indications for RALEPLND were a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > or = 10 ng/ml or a preoperative Gleason score > or = 7. The data were evaluated retrospectively. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: The transperitoneal approach was used in all cases. In order to gain optimal access to the common iliac bifurcation, the five trocars were placed in a more cephalad position than in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy without RALEPLND. After identification of important landmarks, the lymphatics covering the external iliac vein, the obturator lymphatic packet, and the lymphatics overlying the internal iliac artery were removed on both sides. MEASUREMENTS: The total lymph node yield, the frequency of lymph node metastases, and the complication rate. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median patient age was 64 yr (range: 45-78). The median preoperative PSA level was 7.7 ng/ml (range: 1.5-84.6). The median number of lymph nodes harvested was 19 (range: 8-53). In 16 patients (16%), we found lymph node metastasis. Complications occurred in seven patients (7%).
CONCLUSIONS: RALEPLND is feasible, and its lymph node yield is well in the range of open series. The robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach in itself does not seem to limit a surgeon's ability to perform a complete extended pelvic lymph node dissection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19101076     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  19 in total

1.  Prognostic value of unifocal and multifocal positive surgical margins in a large series of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Etienne Xavier Keller; Jacqueline Bachofner; Anna Jelena Britschgi; Karim Saba; Ashkan Mortezavi; Basil Kaufmann; Christian D Fankhauser; Peter Wild; Tullio Sulser; Thomas Hermanns; Daniel Eberli; Cédric Poyet
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Capsular incision in normal prostatic tissue during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a new concept or a waste of time?

Authors:  Nicolas Koutlidis; Céline Duperron; Mathilde Funes de la Vega; Eric Mourey; Frédéric Michel; Luc Cormier
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Current status of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ilija Aleksic; Tyler Luthringer; Vladimir Mouraviev; David M Albala
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-12-11

4.  Prostate cancer: risk versus benefit of lymph node dissection during prostatectomy.

Authors:  Christopher J Kane; Michael A Liss
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Clinical impact of prostate biopsy undergrading in an academic and community setting.

Authors:  Ashkan Mortezavi; Etienne Xavier Keller; Cédric Poyet; Thomas Hermanns; Karim Saba; Marco Randazzo; Christian Daniel Fankhauser; Peter J Wild; Holger Moch; Tullio Sulser; Daniel Eberli
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Pelvic lymph node dissection for patients with elevated risk of lymph node invasion during radical prostatectomy: comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted procedures.

Authors:  Jonathan L Silberstein; Andrew J Vickers; Nicholas E Power; Raul O Parra; Jonathan A Coleman; Rodrigo Pinochet; Karim A Touijer; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Vincent P Laudone
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Temporal trends and predictors of pelvic lymph node dissection in open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew H Feifer; Elena B Elkin; William T Lowrance; Brian Denton; Lindsay Jacks; David S Yee; Jonathan A Coleman; Vincent P Laudone; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  68Ga-PSMA-11 PET has the potential to improve patient selection for extended pelvic lymph node dissection in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniela A Ferraro; Urs J Muehlematter; Helena I Garcia Schüler; Niels J Rupp; Martin Huellner; Michael Messerli; Jan Hendrik Rüschoff; Edwin E G W Ter Voert; Thomas Hermanns; Irene A Burger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Management of pelvic lymphoceles following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Omer A Raheem; Wassim M Bazzi; J Kellogg Parsons; Christopher J Kane
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2012-05

Review 10.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  N L Sharma; N C Shah; D E Neal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.