Literature DB >> 19100540

Extensive tissue damage of bovine ovaries after bipolar ovarian drilling compared to monopolar electrocoagulation or carbon dioxide laser.

Marja-Liisa Hendriks1, Paul van der Valk, Cornelis B Lambalk, Mark A M Broeckaert, Roy Homburg, Peter G A Hompes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the size of ovarian damage caused by ovarian drilling in polycystic ovary syndrome, the amount of inflicted damage was assessed for the most frequently used ovarian drilling techniques.
DESIGN: Experimental prospective design.
SETTING: University clinic. PATIENT(S): Six fresh bovine ovaries per technique. INTERVENTION(S): Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) laser, monopolar electrocoagulation, and bipolar electrocoagulation were used for in vitro ovarian drilling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Amount of inflicted ovarian damage per procedure. RESULT(S): Bipolar electrocoagulation resulted in significantly more destruction per burn than the CO(2) laser and monopolar electrocoagulation (287.6 versus 24.0 and 70.0 mm(3), respectively). The damage found per lesion was multiplied by the regularly applied number of punctures per procedure in daily practice (based on the literature). Again, the bipolar electrocoagulation resulted in significantly more tissue damage than the CO(2) laser and monopolar coagulation (2,876 versus 599 and 700 mm(3), respectively). CONCLUSION(S): Ovarian drilling, especially bipolar electrocoagulation, causes extensive destruction of the ovary. Given the same clinical effectiveness of the various procedures, it is essential to use the lowest possible dose that works; thus, the first choice should be CO(2) laser or monopolar electrocoagulation. Copyright 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19100540     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  5 in total

1.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy and adenomyomectomy with a flexible CO2 laser device.

Authors:  Sara E Barton; Antonio R Gargiulo
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-06-24

2.  Primum Non Nocere.

Authors:  Gautam N Allahbadia
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-11-13

3.  Ovarian cryopreservation after laparoscopic ovariectomy using the Endo-GIA stapling device and LAPRO-clip absorbable ligating clip in a woman: a case report.

Authors:  Isabelle Roux; Michaël Grynberg; Jenna Linehan; Alexandra Messner; Xavier Deffieux
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2011-02-03

4.  Adequacy of ovarian diathermy under ultrasound control: an experimental model.

Authors:  Anita Mylius Pimentel; Lucia Maria Kliemann; Daniela Dos Santos Brum; Fábio Gallas Leivas; Paulo Roberto Stefani Sanches; Edison Capp; Helena von Eye Corleta
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.234

5.  Luteinizing hormone and androstendione are independent predictors of ovulation after laparoscopic ovarian drilling: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Johannes Ott; Stefan Wirth; Kazem Nouri; Christine Kurz; Klaus Mayerhofer; Johannes C Huber; Clemens B Tempfer
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 5.211

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.