Literature DB >> 19098257

Self-categorization with a novel mixed-race group moderates automatic social and racial biases.

Jay J Van Bavel1, William A Cunningham.   

Abstract

People perceive and evaluate others according to social categories. Yet social perception is complicated by the fact that people have multiple social identities, and self-categorization with these identities shifts from one situation to another. Two experiments examined whether self-categorization with a novel mixed-race group would override automatic racial bias. Participants assigned to a mixed-race group had more positive automatic evaluations of Black ingroup than Black outgroup members. Comparing these evaluations to Black and White faces unaffiliated with either group indicated this preference was driven by ingroup bias rather than outgroup derogation. Moreover, both outgroup and unaffiliated faces elicited automatic racial bias (White > Black), suggesting that automatic evaluations are sensitive to both the current intergroup context (positive evaluations of novel ingroup members) and race (racial bias toward outgroup and unaffiliated faces). These experiments provide evidence that self-categorization can override automatic racial bias and that automatic evaluations shift between and within social contexts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19098257     DOI: 10.1177/0146167208327743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  29 in total

1.  Is race erased? Decoding race from patterns of neural activity when skin color is not diagnostic of group boundaries.

Authors:  Kyle G Ratner; Christian Kaul; Jay J Van Bavel
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  The neuroscience of race.

Authors:  Jennifer T Kubota; Mahzarin R Banaji; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Epigenetic modifications and human disease.

Authors:  Anna Portela; Manel Esteller
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Effects of Minimal Grouping On Implicit Prejudice, Infrahumanization, and Neural Processing Despite Orthogonal Social Categorizations.

Authors:  Jeremy C Simon; Jennifer N Gutsell
Journal:  Group Process Intergroup Relat       Date:  2019-05-06

5.  Is social categorization based on relational ingroup/outgroup opposition? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aleksandr V Shkurko
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Intergroup differences in the sharing of emotive states: neural evidence of an empathy gap.

Authors:  Jennifer N Gutsell; Michael Inzlicht
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Hungry for inclusion: Exposure to peer victimization and heightened social monitoring in adolescent girls.

Authors:  Eva H Telzer; Carina H Fowler; Megan M Davis; Karen D Rudolph
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2020-10

8.  BRAIN REWARD ACTIVITY TO MASKED IN-GROUP SMILING FACES PREDICTS FRIENDSHIP DEVELOPMENT.

Authors:  Pin-Hao A Chen; Paul J Whalen; Jonathan B Freeman; James M Taylor; Todd F Heatherton
Journal:  Soc Psychol Personal Sci       Date:  2015-05-01

9.  Neurophysiological and Psychological Consequences of Social Exclusion: The Effects of Cueing In-Group and Out-Group Status.

Authors:  Michael Jenkins; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-08-29

10.  Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses.

Authors:  M Cikara; E Bruneau; J J Van Bavel; R Saxe
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2014-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.