OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report on clinical experience with and observations made during primary CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage of acute necrotizing pancreatitis and to compare results among patients with sterile and those with infected necrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed clinical, radiologic, and bacteriologic data on 35 patients (23 men, 12 women; mean age, 50 years; range, 21-83 years) with acute necrotizing pancreatitis refractory to standard medical care who underwent CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage with 12- to 22-French catheters. Experiences with two subgroups were compared. One group consisted of 22 patients, 10 with multisystem organ failure, who presented with sterile necrosis (median Atlanta score, 1.3; range, 0-3). The other group consisted of 13 patients, one with multisystem organ failure, who presented with infected necrosis (median Atlanta score, 0.4; range, 0-3). Differences between the group with sterile and the group with infected necrosis were analyzed with the Fisher-Holton exact and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Among 35 patients, 17 (49%) were treated successfully with CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage alone. The effectiveness of CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage in patients with sterile necrosis (11/22, 50%) was not significantly different from that of drainage in patients with infected necrosis (6/13, 46%). Among 11 patients with multisystem organ failure (10 with sterile necrosis, one with infected necrosis), only four (36%) were treated successfully with CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage alone; five patients (45%) died. Among 24 patients without multisystem organ failure, 13 (54%) were treated successfully with CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage alone; one patient died. CONCLUSION: In our experience, primary CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage was successful for approximately one half of the patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. The presence of multisystem organ failure appears to be a more important indicator of outcome than does the presence of infection.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report on clinical experience with and observations made during primary CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage of acute necrotizing pancreatitis and to compare results among patients with sterile and those with infected necrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed clinical, radiologic, and bacteriologic data on 35 patients (23 men, 12 women; mean age, 50 years; range, 21-83 years) with acute necrotizing pancreatitis refractory to standard medical care who underwent CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage with 12- to 22-French catheters. Experiences with two subgroups were compared. One group consisted of 22 patients, 10 with multisystem organ failure, who presented with sterile necrosis (median Atlanta score, 1.3; range, 0-3). The other group consisted of 13 patients, one with multisystem organ failure, who presented with infected necrosis (median Atlanta score, 0.4; range, 0-3). Differences between the group with sterile and the group with infected necrosis were analyzed with the Fisher-Holton exact and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Among 35 patients, 17 (49%) were treated successfully with CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage alone. The effectiveness of CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage in patients with sterile necrosis (11/22, 50%) was not significantly different from that of drainage in patients with infected necrosis (6/13, 46%). Among 11 patients with multisystem organ failure (10 with sterile necrosis, one with infected necrosis), only four (36%) were treated successfully with CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage alone; five patients (45%) died. Among 24 patients without multisystem organ failure, 13 (54%) were treated successfully with CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage alone; one patient died. CONCLUSION: In our experience, primary CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage was successful for approximately one half of the patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. The presence of multisystem organ failure appears to be a more important indicator of outcome than does the presence of infection.
Authors: Christopher C Stahl; Jonathan Moulton; Doan Vu; Ross Ristagno; Kyuran Choe; Jeffrey J Sussman; Shimul A Shah; Syed A Ahmad; Daniel E Abbott Journal: Surgery Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Janneke van Grinsven; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Marja A Boermeester; Cornelis H Dejong; Casper H van Eijck; Paul Fockens; Marc G Besselink Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 46.802