Literature DB >> 19098028

PuMA: Bayesian analysis of partitioned (and unpartitioned) model adequacy.

Jeremy M Brown1, Robert ElDabaje.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: The accuracy of Bayesian phylogenetic inference using molecular data depends on the use of proper models of sequence evolution. Although choosing the best model available from a pool of alternatives has become standard practice in statistical phylogenetics, assessment of the chosen model's adequacy is rare. Programs for Bayesian phylogenetic inference have recently begun to implement models of sequence evolution that account for heterogeneity across sites beyond variation in rates of evolution, yet no program exists to assess the adequacy of these models. PuMA implements a posterior predictive simulation approach to assessing the adequacy of partitioned, unpartitioned and mixture models of DNA sequence evolution in a Bayesian context. Assessment of model adequacy allows empirical phylogeneticists to have appropriate confidence in their results and guides efforts to improve models of sequence evolution. AVAILABILITY: This program is available as source code, a Java.jar application, and a native Mac OS X application. It is distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License at http://code.google.com/p/phylo-puma.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19098028     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  10 in total

Review 1.  Bayesian quantitative electrophysiology and its multiple applications in bioengineering.

Authors:  Roger C Barr; Loren W Nolte; Andrew E Pollard
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010

2.  Posterior predictive Bayesian phylogenetic model selection.

Authors:  Paul O Lewis; Wangang Xie; Ming-Hui Chen; Yu Fan; Lynn Kuo
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Newly discovered sister lineage sheds light on early ant evolution.

Authors:  Christian Rabeling; Jeremy M Brown; Manfred Verhaagh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Multigene phylogenetic analysis redefines dung beetles relationships and classification (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae).

Authors:  Sergei Tarasov; Dimitar Dimitrov
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Evolutionary Rate Variation among Lineages in Gene Trees has a Negative Impact on Species-Tree Inference.

Authors:  Mezzalina Vankan; Simon Y W Ho; David A Duchêne
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Measuring Asymmetry in Time-Stamped Phylogenies.

Authors:  Bethany L Dearlove; Simon D W Frost
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Probabilistic graphical model representation in phylogenetics.

Authors:  Sebastian Höhna; Tracy A Heath; Bastien Boussau; Michael J Landis; Fredrik Ronquist; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  Evaluating the Adequacy of Molecular Clock Models Using Posterior Predictive Simulations.

Authors:  David A Duchêne; Sebastian Duchêne; Edward C Holmes; Simon Y W Ho
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  The Prevalence and Impact of Model Violations in Phylogenetic Analysis.

Authors:  Suha Naser-Khdour; Bui Quang Minh; Wenqi Zhang; Eric A Stone; Robert Lanfear
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  πBUSS: a parallel BEAST/BEAGLE utility for sequence simulation under complex evolutionary scenarios.

Authors:  Filip Bielejec; Philippe Lemey; Luiz Max Carvalho; Guy Baele; Andrew Rambaut; Marc A Suchard
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.