Literature DB >> 19097876

Response of juvenile scalloped hammerhead sharks to electric stimuli.

Stephen M Kajiura1, Timothy P Fitzgerald.   

Abstract

Sharks can use their electrosensory system to detect electric fields in their environment. Measurements of their electrosensitivity are often derived by calculating the voltage gradient from a model of the charge distribution for an ideal dipole. This study measures the charge distribution around a dipole in seawater and confirms the close correspondence with the model. From this, it is possible to predict how the sharks will respond to dipolar electric fields comprised of differing parameters. We tested these predictions by exposing sharks to different sized dipoles and levels of applied current that simulated the bioelectric fields of their natural prey items. The sharks initiated responses from a significantly greater distance with larger dipole sizes and also from a significantly greater distance with increasing levels of electric current. This study is the first to provide empirical evidence supporting a popular theoretical model and test predictions about how sharks will respond to a variety of different electric stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19097876     DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2008.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoology (Jena)        ISSN: 0944-2006            Impact factor:   2.240


  5 in total

1.  Not all electric shark deterrents are made equal: Effects of a commercial electric anklet deterrent on white shark behaviour.

Authors:  Channing A Egeberg; Ryan M Kempster; Nathan S Hart; Laura Ryan; Lucille Chapuis; Caroline C Kerr; Carl Schmidt; Enrico Gennari; Kara E Yopak; Shaun P Collin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Survival of the stillest: predator avoidance in shark embryos.

Authors:  Ryan M Kempster; Nathan S Hart; Shaun P Collin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Multisensory integration and behavioral plasticity in sharks from different ecological niches.

Authors:  Jayne M Gardiner; Jelle Atema; Robert E Hueter; Philip J Motta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  How Close is too Close? The Effect of a Non-Lethal Electric Shark Deterrent on White Shark Behaviour.

Authors:  Ryan M Kempster; Channing A Egeberg; Nathan S Hart; Laura Ryan; Lucille Chapuis; Caroline C Kerr; Carl Schmidt; Charlie Huveneers; Enrico Gennari; Kara E Yopak; Jessica J Meeuwig; Shaun P Collin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effectiveness of five personal shark-bite deterrents for surfers.

Authors:  Charlie Huveneers; Sasha Whitmarsh; Madeline Thiele; Lauren Meyer; Andrew Fox; Corey J A Bradshaw
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.