Literature DB >> 19096944

Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks.

Ulrich Ansorge1, Peter Wühr.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the conditions for observing the Simon effect in go/no-go tasks. The Simon effect denotes faster and more accurate responses when irrelevant stimulus location and response location correspond than when they do not correspond. In four experiments, participants performed both in a choice-response task (CRT) and in a go/no-go task, and we varied the order and the similarity of the tasks. In the CRT, participants pressed a left key to one stimulus colour and a right key to another stimulus colour; in the go/no-go task, participants pressed one (e.g., left) key to one stimulus colour and refrained from responding to the other stimulus colour. As expected, Simon effects were consistently observed in the CRT. In contrast, Simon effects in the go/no-go task were only observed when it followed the CRT and when the mapping of stimulus colours to response locations was preserved between tasks (i.e., in Experiment 4). Results suggest that transfer of a particular S-R rule including response location from the CRT to the go/no-go task was responsible for the Simon effect in the latter task. In general, results are consistent with a response-discrimination account of the Simon effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19096944     DOI: 10.1080/17470210802426866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  12 in total

1.  Working-memory load decreases mappings effects in spatial-compatibility tasks.

Authors:  Peter Wühr
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-12-24

2.  Transfer of learning in choice reactions: The roles of stimulus type, response mode, and set-level compatibility.

Authors:  Motonori Yamaguchi; Jing Chen; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

3.  Facilitation and interference components in the joint Simon task.

Authors:  Luca Ferraro; Cristina Iani; Michele Mariani; Nadia Milanese; Sandro Rubichi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  When task sharing reduces interference: evidence for division-of-labour in Stroop-like tasks.

Authors:  Roberta Sellaro; Barbara Treccani; Roberto Cubelli
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-07-03

5.  A Simon-like effect in Go/No-Go tasks performed in isolation.

Authors:  Karen Davranche; Laurence Carbonnell; Clément Belletier; Franck Vidal; Pascal Huguet; Thibault Gajdos; Thierry Hasbroucq
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

6.  Influence of stimulus--response assignment on the joint-action correspondence effect.

Authors:  Melanie Y Lam; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-12-31

7.  It wasn't me! Motor activation from irrelevant spatial information in the absence of a response.

Authors:  Carsten Bundt; Lara Bardi; Elger L Abrahamse; Marcel Brass; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  When co-action eliminates the Simon effect: disentangling the impact of co-actor's presence and task sharing on joint-task performance.

Authors:  Roberta Sellaro; Barbara Treccani; Sandro Rubichi; Roberto Cubelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-19

9.  Exploring social influences on the joint Simon task: empathy and friendship.

Authors:  Ruth M Ford; Bradley Aberdein
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-09

10.  Neuroimaging of the joint Simon effect with believed biological and non-biological co-actors.

Authors:  Tanya Wen; Shulan Hsieh
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.