Literature DB >> 19095857

A randomized trial of maximum cephalad sensory blockade with single-shot spinal compared with combined spinal-epidural techniques for cesarean delivery.

Damian J Horstman1, Edward T Riley, Brendan Carvalho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown more extensive cephalad sensory blockade in women receiving combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia compared with single-shot spinal (SSS) anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. It has been postulated that introduction of the epidural needle during CSE disturbs the negative pressure in the epidural space, resulting in relatively greater cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure and increased spread of intrathecal local anesthetic. We tested the hypothesis that CSE results in more extensive cephalad sensory blockade than SSS anesthesia and that loss-of-resistance during initiation of CSE anesthesia increases CSF pressure compared with SSS.
METHODS: Thirty parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind study. Patients received either SSS or CSE anesthesia with equal doses of intrathecal anesthetic (hyperbaric bupivacaine 12 mg, fentanyl 10 microg and morphine 200 microg). Before the intrathecal injection, the CSF pressure was measured with a fiberoptic pressure sensor. Maximum cephalad sensory blockade to pinprick, cold and touch was measured. The total dose of phenylephrine required to maintain baseline arterial blood pressure was also recorded.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the median (interquartile range) pinprick sensory block height [T4 (T4-2) vs T3 (T4-1)] or CSF pressures [6 (4-12) vs 9 (8-12) mm Hg] between the SSS and CSE groups. There were no significant correlations between CSF pressure and block height or total dose of phenylephrine.
CONCLUSION: The SSS and CSE techniques inserted in the lateral decubitus position resulted in similar extent of sensory blockade and CSF pressure. These findings suggest that altering the intrathecal dose is not necessary and that any difference in intrathecal pressure associated with initial placement of an epidural needle in the epidural space during CSE anesthesia is clinically inconsequential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19095857     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818e0fa6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of analgesic effects of intrathecal clonidine along with bupivacaine in cesarean section.

Authors:  Nikhil Kothari; Jaishri Bogra; Ajay K Chaudhary
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2011-01

2.  Comparison of Spinal Block Levels between Laboring and Nonlaboring Parturients Using Combined Spinal Epidural Technique with Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine.

Authors:  Yu-Ying Tang; Jie Zhou; Xiao-Hui Ren; Xue-Mei Lin
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-06-20

Review 3.  Combined spinal-epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  Scott W Simmons; Alicia T Dennis; Allan M Cyna; Matthew G Richardson; Matthew R Bright
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-11

4.  Suspected total spinal in patient having emergent Caesarean section, a case report and literature review.

Authors:  H Virgin; E Oddby; J G Jakobsson
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-10-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.