PURPOSE: Radiotherapy (XRT) for spine sarcomas is constrained by spinal cord, nerve, and viscera tolerance. Negative surgical margins are uncommon; hence, doses of >or=66 Gy are recommended. A Phase II clinical trial evaluated high-dose photon/proton XRT for spine sarcomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients had nonmetastatic, thoracic, lumbar, and/or sacral spine/paraspinal sarcomas. Treatment included pre- and/or postoperative photon/proton XRT with or without radical resection; patients with osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma received chemotherapy. Shrinking fields delivered 50.4 cobalt Gray equivalent (Gy RBE) to subclinical disease, 70.2 Gy RBE to microscopic disease in the tumor bed, and 77.4 Gy RBE to gross disease at 1.8 Gy RBE qd. Doses were reduced for radiosensitive histologies, concurrent chemoradiation, or when diabetes or autoimmune disease present. Spinal cord dose was limited to 63/54 Gy RBE to surface/center. Intraoperative boost doses of 7.5 to 10 Gy could be given by dural plaque. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients (29 chordoma, 14 chondrosarcoma, 7 other) underwent gross total (n = 25) or subtotal (n = 12) resection or biopsy (n = 13). With 48 month median follow-up, 5-year actuarial local control, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival are: 78%, 63%, and 87% respectively. Two of 36 (5.6%) patients treated for primary versus 7/14 (50%) for recurrent tumor developed local recurrence (p < 0.001). Five patients developed late radiation-associated complications; no myelopathy developed but three sacral neuropathies appeared after 77.12 to 77.4 Gy RBE. CONCLUSIONS: Local control with this treatment is high in patients radiated at the time of primary presentation. Spinal cord dose constraints appear to be safe. Sacral nerves receiving 77.12-77.4 Gy RBE are at risk for late toxicity.
PURPOSE: Radiotherapy (XRT) for spine sarcomas is constrained by spinal cord, nerve, and viscera tolerance. Negative surgical margins are uncommon; hence, doses of >or=66 Gy are recommended. A Phase II clinical trial evaluated high-dose photon/proton XRT for spine sarcomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients had nonmetastatic, thoracic, lumbar, and/or sacral spine/paraspinal sarcomas. Treatment included pre- and/or postoperative photon/proton XRT with or without radical resection; patients with osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma received chemotherapy. Shrinking fields delivered 50.4 cobalt Gray equivalent (Gy RBE) to subclinical disease, 70.2 Gy RBE to microscopic disease in the tumor bed, and 77.4 Gy RBE to gross disease at 1.8 Gy RBE qd. Doses were reduced for radiosensitive histologies, concurrent chemoradiation, or when diabetes or autoimmune disease present. Spinal cord dose was limited to 63/54 Gy RBE to surface/center. Intraoperative boost doses of 7.5 to 10 Gy could be given by dural plaque. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients (29 chordoma, 14 chondrosarcoma, 7 other) underwent gross total (n = 25) or subtotal (n = 12) resection or biopsy (n = 13). With 48 month median follow-up, 5-year actuarial local control, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival are: 78%, 63%, and 87% respectively. Two of 36 (5.6%) patients treated for primary versus 7/14 (50%) for recurrent tumor developed local recurrence (p < 0.001). Five patients developed late radiation-associated complications; no myelopathy developed but three sacral neuropathies appeared after 77.12 to 77.4 Gy RBE. CONCLUSIONS: Local control with this treatment is high in patients radiated at the time of primary presentation. Spinal cord dose constraints appear to be safe. Sacral nerves receiving 77.12-77.4 Gy RBE are at risk for late toxicity.
Authors: J E Munzenrider; M Austin-Seymour; P J Blitzer; R Gentry; M Goitein; E S Gragoudas; K Johnson; A M Koehler; P McNulty; G Moulton Journal: Strahlentherapie Date: 1985-12
Authors: M Austin-Seymour; J Munzenrider; M Goitein; L Verhey; M Urie; R Gentry; S Birnbaum; D Ruotolo; P McManus; S Skates Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 1989-01 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: J C Yang; A E Chang; A R Baker; W F Sindelar; D N Danforth; S L Topalian; T DeLaney; E Glatstein; S M Steinberg; M J Merino; S A Rosenberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Matthew T Houdek; Peter S Rose; Mario Hevesi; Joseph H Schwab; Anthony M Griffin; John H Healey; Ivy A Petersen; Thomas F DeLaney; Peter W Chung; Michael J Yaszemski; Jay S Wunder; Francis J Hornicek; Patrick J Boland; Franklin H Sim; Peter C Ferguson Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: I Frank Ciernik; Andrzej Niemierko; David C Harmon; Wendy Kobayashi; Yen-Lin Chen; Torunn I Yock; David H Ebb; Edwin Choy; Kevin A Raskin; Norbert Liebsch; Francis J Hornicek; Thomas F Delaney Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: M Mima; Y Demizu; D Jin; N Hashimoto; M Takagi; K Terashima; O Fujii; Y Niwa; T Akagi; T Daimon; Y Hishikawa; M Abe; M Murakami; R Sasaki; N Fuwa Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Richard F Riedel; Nicole Larrier; Leslie Dodd; David Kirsch; Salutario Martinez; Brian E Brigman Journal: Curr Treat Options Oncol Date: 2009-02-24
Authors: S J Treece; M Mukesh; Y L Rimmer; S J Tudor; J C Dean; R J Benson; D L Gregory; G Horan; S J Jefferies; S G Russell; M V Williams; C B Wilson; N G Burnet Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.039