Literature DB >> 19095119

Morbidity associated with laparoscopic repair of suprapubic hernias.

Brandon Varnell1, Sharon Bachman, Jacob Quick, Michelle Vitamvas, Bruce Ramshaw, Dmitry Oleynikov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic suprapubic hernia repair (LSHR) is frequently a technically difficult procedure. This is often due to extensive adhesions from multiple previous operations, the necessary wide pelvic dissection, and adequate mesh coverage with transfascial suture fixation. The aim of the current study was to document the complications and morbidity associated with the repair of suprapubic hernias.
METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with complex suprapubic ventral hernias undergoing laparoscopic repair between 2003 and 2007 at 2 university-based practices by 1 surgeon at each facility was conducted. The operative techniques were similar and included dissection into the space of Retzius to mobilize the dome of the bladder, intraperitoneal onlay of mesh using a barrier mesh, careful tack fixation to the pubic bone and Cooper's ligaments, and extensive transfascial suture fixation of the mesh.
RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were reviewed, 29 women and 18 men, with a mean age of 54 years. Patients averaged 3.5 previous abdominal surgeries (SD +/-2.3) and had a mean body mass index (BMI) of 35.1 (SD +/-7.5). Previous ventral hernia repairs had been performed in 57% of patients. Average defect size was 139.8 cm(2) (SD +/-126) and average mesh size was 453.8 (SD +/-329.0), with an average hernia-to-mesh ratio of 3.2. Median length of stay was 3 days with a mean follow-up of 2.6 months (SD +/-3.1). There were 18 complications (38%): symptomatic seroma (n = 4), prolonged ileus (n = 2), chronic pain (n = 2), postoperative urinary retention (n = 2), enterotomy (n = 1), intraoperative bladder injury (n = 1), postoperative urinary tract infection (n = 1), mesh infection (n = 1), rapid ventricular rate (n = 1), small bowel obstruction (n = 1), pulmonary embolism (n = 1), and pneumonia (n = 1). One patient required conversion to open ventral hernia repair, no injury was identified. Recurrence occurred in 3 patients (6.3%). The mechanisms of recurrence included reherniation at the level of the pubic tubercle, a lateral mesh recurrence in a patient with a high BMI and small abdominal excursion, and in a pregnant patient who developed a fixation suture hernia.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic suprapubic hernia repair is safe and effective with a relatively low recurrence rate, considering the complexity of the repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19095119     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  9 in total

1.  Laparoscopic repair of suprapubic hernias: transabdominal partial extraperitoneal (TAPE) technique.

Authors:  Anil Sharma; Ashish Dey; Rajesh Khullar; Vandana Soni; Manish Baijal; Pradeep K Chowbey
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  SAGES guidelines for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  David Earle; J Scott Roth; Alan Saber; Steve Haggerty; Joel F Bradley; Robert Fanelli; Raymond Price; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: updated Consensus Development Conference based guidelines [corrected].

Authors:  Gianfranco Silecchia; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Luis Sanchez; Graziano Ceccarelli; Armando Antinori; Luca Ansaloni; Stefano Olmi; Giovanni Carlo Ferrari; Diego Cuccurullo; Paolo Baccari; Ferdinando Agresta; Nereo Vettoretto; Micaela Piccoli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  A new classification for seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  S Morales-Conde
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Standard of Open Surgical Repair of Suprapubic Incisional Hernias.

Authors:  Yohann Renard; Anne-Charlotte Simonneau; Louis de Mestier; Lugdivine Teuma; Jean-Luc Meffert; Jean-Pierre Palot; Reza Kianmanesh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Importance of recurrence rating, morphology, hernial gap size, and risk factors in ventral and incisional hernia classification.

Authors:  U A Dietz; M S Winkler; R W Härtel; A Fleischhacker; A Wiegering; C Isbert; Ch Jurowich; P Heuschmann; C-T Germer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Laparoscopic repair of large suprapubic hernias.

Authors:  Hasan Ediz Sikar; Kenan Çetin; Kemal Eyvaz; Levent Kaptanoglu; Hasan Fehmi Küçük
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 1.195

8.  Effect of complete reduction of hernia sac and transection of hernia sac during laparoscopic indirect inguinal hernia repair on seroma.

Authors:  Chunpeng Pan; Xin Xu; Xianke Si; Jiwei Yu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 2.030

9.  Single-incision laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair of supra-pubic incisional hernia: A case report.

Authors:  Masaki Wakasugi; Yujiro Nakahara; Masaki Hirota; Takashi Matsumoto; Takashi Kusu; Hiroyoshi Takemoto; Ko Takachi; Satoshi Oshima
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-09-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.