Literature DB >> 19095107

How important is rigid proctosigmoidoscopy in localizing rectal cancer?

Hans F Schoellhammer1, Armen C Gregorian, Grant G Sarkisyan, Beverley A Petrie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopic localization of rectal and rectosigmoid tumors may be inaccurate. Rigid proctosigmoidoscopy has been suggested as an adjunctive technique to accurately localize rectal tumors as it may alter treatment options.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with rectal and rectosigmoid cancer from 2001 to 2006. Patients were stratified into 1 of 4 anatomic regions based on colonoscopic localization of the tumor. The distances of the tumor from the anal verge by colonoscopy were compared with distances obtained via rigid proctosigmoidoscopy.
RESULTS: Rigid proctosigmoidoscopy localization likely changed the treatment options in 21% of lower rectal tumors, 14% of middle rectal tumors, 38% of upper rectal tumors, and 29% of rectosigmoid tumors. Overall, this modality impacted 25% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Rigid proctosigmoidoscopy localization of rectal tumors can significantly change treatment options and should be performed on all patients with colonoscopic localization of a cancer thought to be in the rectosigmoid or rectum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19095107     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  16 in total

1.  Accuracy of colonoscopic localization.

Authors:  Khashayar Vaziri; Sarah C Choxi; Bruce A Orkin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Consensus statement: the 16th Annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference; Saskatoon, Saskatchewan; September 5-6, 2014.

Authors:  S Ahmed; O Bathe; S Berry; D Buie; J Davies; C Doll; S Dowden; S Gill; V Gordon; P Hebbard; E Jones; H Kennecke; S Koski; M Krahn; D Le; H Lim; C Lund; Y Luo; A Mcffadden; J Mcghie; K Mulder; J Park; F Rashidi; A Sami; K T Tan; R Wong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Rectal Cancer in 2018: A Primer for the Gastroenterologist.

Authors:  Benjamin A Goldenberg; Emma B Holliday; Ramzi M Helewa; Harminder Singh
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Laparoscopic extraperitoneal rectal cancer surgery: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  R Siegel; M A Cuesta; E Targarona; F G Bader; M Morino; R Corcelles; A M Lacy; L Påhlman; E Haglind; K Bujko; H P Bruch; M M Heiss; M Eikermann; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Endoscopic Localization of Colon Cancer Is Frequently Inaccurate.

Authors:  Jennifer Nayor; Stephen R Rotman; Walter W Chan; Joel E Goldberg; John R Saltzman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Should all endoscopically excised rectal polyps be tattooed? A plea for localization.

Authors:  Deborah Keller; Jane Jaffe; Matthew M Philp; Oleh Haluszka; Amit Khanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Diagnosis of rectal cancer by Tissue Resonance Interaction Method.

Authors:  Alberto Vannelli; Luigi Battaglia; Elia Poiasina; Ermanno Leo
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  How to accurately measure the distance from the anal verge to rectal cancer on MRI: a prospective study using anal verge markers.

Authors:  Yeo Eun Han; Beom Jin Park; Deuk Jae Sung; Min Ju Kim; Na Yeon Han; Ki Choon Sim; Sung Bum Cho; Jin Kim; Seon-Hahn Kim; Hyonggin An
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-20

9.  The anthropometric definition of the rectum is highly variable.

Authors:  Molly A Wasserman; Michael F McGee; Irene B Helenowski; Amy L Halverson; Anne-Marie Boller; Steven J Stryker
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Early rectal cancer: the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) clinical consensus conference.

Authors:  Mario Morino; Mauro Risio; Simon Bach; Regina Beets-Tan; Krzysztof Bujko; Yves Panis; Philip Quirke; Bjorn Rembacken; Eric Rullier; Yutaka Saito; Tonia Young-Fadok; Marco Ettore Allaix
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.