Literature DB >> 19095100

Screening cervical spine MRI after normal cervical spine CT scans in patients in whom cervical spine injury cannot be excluded by physical examination.

Megan Steigelman1, Peter Lopez, Daniel Dent, John Myers, Michael Corneille, Ronald Stewart, Stephen Cohn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine injuries can occur in as many as 10% of patients with blunt trauma with mental status changes from closed head injuries. Despite normal results on cervical spine computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often recommended to exclude ligamentous or soft tissue injury.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of trauma patients admitted to a level I trauma center from 2002 to 2006, in whom cervical spine injuries could not be excluded by physical examination. All patients with normal results on cervical spine CT followed by cervical spine MRI were included in the analysis.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients underwent MRI to examine their cervical spines. Seven patients had abnormal MRI findings suggestive of acute traumatic injury. No MRI studies led to operative intervention. Screening MRI increased from 1% of comatose patients in 2002 to 18% in 2006.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of MRI in patients with normal results on cervical spine CT does not appear to alter treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19095100     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical review: Spinal imaging for the adult obtunded blunt trauma patient: update from 2004.

Authors:  James O M Plumb; C G Morris
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Cervical spinal clearance: A prospective Western Trauma Association Multi-institutional Trial.

Authors:  Kenji Inaba; Saskya Byerly; Lisa D Bush; Matthew J Martin; David T Martin; Kimberly A Peck; Galinos Barmparas; Matthew J Bradley; Joshua P Hazelton; Raul Coimbra; Asad J Choudhry; Carlos V R Brown; Chad G Ball; Jill R Cherry-Bukowiec; Clay Cothren Burlew; Bellal Joseph; Julie Dunn; Christian T Minshall; Matthew M Carrick; Gina M Berg; Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 3.  Utility of MRI for cervical spine clearance after blunt traumatic injury: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ajay Malhotra; Xiao Wu; Vivek B Kalra; Holly K Grossetta Nardini; Renu Liu; Khalid M Abbed; Howard P Forman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Cervical spine collar clearance in the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient: a systematic review and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

Authors:  Mayur B Patel; Stephen S Humble; Daniel C Cullinane; Matthew A Day; Randeep S Jawa; Clinton J Devin; Margaret S Delozier; Lou M Smith; Miya A Smith; Jeannette M Capella; Andrea M Long; Joseph S Cheng; Taylor C Leath; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Elliott R Haut; John J Como
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.313

5.  Outcomes of Patients With Negative Cervical Imaging but Persistent Neck Tenderness Discharged With a Rigid Collar After Trauma.

Authors:  Melanie M Randall; John Egbert; Breanna M Ito; Jared E Yalung; Lance Brown
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-15

6.  Application of Normative Occipital Condyle-C1 Interval Measurements to Detect Atlanto-Occipital Injury in Children.

Authors:  B Corcoran; L L Linscott; J L Leach; S Vadivelu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  A systematic review of the need for MRI for the clearance of cervical spine injury in obtunded blunt trauma patients after normal cervical spine CT.

Authors:  Iyore Ao James; Ahmad Moukalled; Elizabeth Yu; David B Tulman; Sergio D Bergese; Christian D Jones; Stanislaw Pa Stawicki; David C Evans
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2014-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.