Literature DB >> 19095068

Do women see things differently than men do?

Norbert Jausovec1, Ksenija Jausovec.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of gender on brain activity. Thirty male and 30 female respondents solved simple auditory and visual tasks while their electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded. Also recorded was the percentage of oxygen saturation of hemoglobin (%StO(2)) in the respondents' frontal brain areas with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). The attended task condition was based on the oddball paradigm. Respondents had to mentally count infrequent target stimuli - tones or shapes. In the unattended condition they just listened to tones or viewed different shapes. Gender related differences in EEG activity were only observed in the amplitudes of the early evoked gamma response and the P3 component. Women displayed higher amplitudes than men. A second finding was that these differences were more pronounced for the visual than for the auditory stimuli. No gender related differences were observed in the ERP latencies, as well as in the amplitudes of the P1-N1 complex, and the induced gamma response. The NIRS data showed that males in their frontal brain areas displayed a higher percentage of StO(2) than did females; and males also showed a higher increase in %StO(2) during task performance as compared with the resting condition. Taken all together the results suggest that the females' visual event-categorization process is more efficient than in males. The data are discussed in the theoretical framework of the evolutionary theory of human spatial sex differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19095068     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  9 in total

1.  Sex differences in brain structure in auditory and cingulate regions.

Authors:  Caroline C Brun; Natasha Leporé; Eileen Luders; Yi-Yu Chou; Sarah K Madsen; Arthur W Toga; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Sex differences in equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: effects on N2 and P3.

Authors:  Sigita Melynyte; Osvaldas Ruksenas; Inga Griskova-Bulanova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Quantification of extra-cerebral and cerebral hemoglobin concentrations during physical exercise using time-domain near infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Héloïse Auger; Louis Bherer; Étienne Boucher; Richard Hoge; Frédéric Lesage; Mathieu Dehaes
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Sex Differences in Gamma Band Functional Connectivity Between the Frontal Lobe and Cortical Areas During an Auditory Oddball Task, as Revealed by Imaginary Coherence Assessment.

Authors:  Toshiro Fujimoto; Eiichi Okumura; Atsushi Kodabashi; Kouzou Takeuchi; Toshiaki Otsubo; Katsumi Nakamura; Kazutaka Yatsushiro; Masaki Sekine; Shinichiro Kamiya; Susumu Shimooki; Toshiyo Tamura
Journal:  Open Neuroimag J       Date:  2016-08-31

Review 5.  Simultaneous functional near-infrared spectroscopy and electroencephalography for monitoring of human brain activity and oxygenation: a review.

Authors:  Antonio M Chiarelli; Filippo Zappasodi; Francesco Di Pompeo; Arcangelo Merla
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.593

6.  Sex differences in high-level appreciation of automobile design-evoked gamma broadband synchronization.

Authors:  Regina W Y Wang; Tsai-Miau Ke; Shang-Wen Chuang; I-Ning Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Cortical volume and 40-Hz auditory-steady-state responses in patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls.

Authors:  Sungkean Kim; Seon-Kyeong Jang; Do-Won Kim; Miseon Shim; Yong-Wook Kim; Chang-Hwan Im; Seung-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.881

8.  Deficient Event-Related Theta Oscillations in Individuals at Risk for Alcoholism: A Study of Reward Processing and Impulsivity Features.

Authors:  Chella Kamarajan; Ashwini K Pandey; David B Chorlian; Niklas Manz; Arthur T Stimus; Andrey P Anokhin; Lance O Bauer; Samuel Kuperman; John Kramer; Kathleen K Bucholz; Marc A Schuckit; Victor M Hesselbrock; Bernice Porjesz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The impact of spoken action words on performance in a cross-modal oddball task.

Authors:  Gregory Neely; Daniel Eriksson Sörman; Jessica K Ljungberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.