Literature DB >> 19095039

Evolution of cooperation on dynamical graphs.

Adám Kun1, István Scheuring.   

Abstract

There are two key characteristic of animal and human societies: (1) degree heterogeneity, meaning that not all individual have the same number of associates; and (2) the interaction topology is not static, i.e. either individuals interact with different set of individuals at different times of their life, or at least they have different associations than their parents. Earlier works have shown that population structure is one of the mechanisms promoting cooperation. However, most studies had assumed that the interaction network can be described by a regular graph (homogeneous degree distribution). Recently there are an increasing number of studies employing degree heterogeneous graphs to model interaction topology. But mostly the interaction topology was assumed to be static. Here we investigate the fixation probability of the cooperator strategy in the prisoner's dilemma, when interaction network is a random regular graph, a random graph or a scale-free graph and the interaction network is allowed to change. We show that the fixation probability of the cooperator strategy is lower when the interaction topology is described by a dynamical graph compared to a static graph. Even a limited network dynamics significantly decreases the fixation probability of cooperation, an effect that is mitigated stronger by degree heterogeneous networks topology than by a degree homogeneous one. We have also found that from the considered graph topologies the decrease of fixation probabilities due to graph dynamics is the lowest on scale-free graphs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19095039     DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2008.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosystems        ISSN: 0303-2647            Impact factor:   1.973


  4 in total

1.  Cooperators Unite! Assortative linking promotes cooperation particularly for medium sized associations.

Authors:  Adám Kun; Gergely Boza; István Scheuring
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.260

2.  Different reactions to adverse neighborhoods in games of cooperation.

Authors:  Chunyan Zhang; Jianlei Zhang; Franz J Weissing; Matjaž Perc; Guangming Xie; Long Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Stirring does not make populations well mixed.

Authors:  Francisco Herrerías-Azcué; Vicente Pérez-Muñuzuri; Tobias Galla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  The role of evolutionary game theory in spatial and non-spatial models of the survival of cooperation in cancer: a review.

Authors:  Helena Coggan; Karen M Page
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.293

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.