Literature DB >> 19094247

Self-organization of foraging behaviour: from simplicity to complexity without goals.

F D Provenza1, J J Villalba, C D Cheney, S J Werner.   

Abstract

A herbivore faces challenges while foraging-ongoing changes in its physiological condition along with variation in the nutrient and toxin concentrations of foods, spatially and temporally-that make selecting a nutritious diet a vital affair. Foraging behaviours arise from simple rules that operate across levels of resolution from cells and organs to individuals and their interactions with social and physical environments. At all these levels, behaviour is a function of its consequences: a behaviour operating on the environment to induce changes is itself changed by those events. Thus, behaviour emerges from its own functioning-behaviour self-organizes-not from that of its surroundings. This ostensible autonomy notwith-standing, no self-organizing system (cell, organ, or individual) is independent of its environs because existence consists of an ongoing exchange of energy and matter. According to this view, the notion of cause and effect is replaced with functional relationships between behaviours and environmental consequences. Changes in physical environments alter the distribution, abundance, nutritional, and toxicological characteristics of plants, which affect food preference. Social interactions early in life influence behaviour in various ways: animals prefer familiar foods and environments, and they prefer to be with companions. Animals in unfamiliar environments often walk farther, ingest less food, and suffer more from malnutrition and toxicity than animals in familiar environments. An individual's food preferences-and its ability to discriminate familiar from novel foods-arise from the functional integration of sensory (smell, taste, texture) and postingestive (effects of nutrients and toxins on chemo-, osmo-, and mechano-receptors) effects. The ability to discriminate among foods is critical for survival: all problems with poisonous plants are due to an inability to discriminate or a lack of alternatives. Animals eat a variety of foods as a result of nearing or exceeding tolerance limits for sensory and postingestive effects unique to each food. After eating any food too frequently or excessively, the likelihood increases that animals will eat alternative foods owing to exceeding sensory-, nutrient-, and toxin-specific tolerance limits. Cyclic patterns of intake of a variety of foods reflect seemingly chaotic interactions among flavours, nutrients, and toxins interacting along continua.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 19094247     DOI: 10.1079/NRR19980015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Res Rev        ISSN: 0954-4224            Impact factor:   7.800


  8 in total

Review 1.  The detoxification limitation hypothesis: where did it come from and where is it going?

Authors:  Karen J Marsh; Ian R Wallis; Rose L Andrew; William J Foley
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  A pharm-ecological perspective of terrestrial and aquatic plant-herbivore interactions.

Authors:  Jennifer Sorensen Forbey; M Denise Dearing; Elisabeth M Gross; Colin M Orians; Erik E Sotka; William J Foley
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Role of species diversity and secondary compound complementarity on diet selection of Mediterranean shrubs by goats.

Authors:  Jozo Rogosic; Richard E Estell; Dragan Skobic; Anita Martinovic; Stanislava Maric
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Both gas chromatography and an electronic nose reflect chemical polymorphism of juniper shrubs browsed or avoided by sheep.

Authors:  Gábor Markó; Ildikó Novák; Jeno Bernáth; Vilmos Altbäcker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  A faecal index of diet quality that predicts reproductive success in a marsupial folivore.

Authors:  Hannah R Windley; Ian R Wallis; Jane L DeGabriel; Ben D Moore; Christopher N Johnson; William J Foley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Kangaroos avoid eating seedlings with or near others with volatile essential oils.

Authors:  Anthea S Jones; Byron B Lamont; Meredith M Fairbanks; Christine M Rafferty
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 7.  Ruminant self-medication against gastrointestinal nematodes: evidence, mechanism, and origins.

Authors:  Juan J Villalba; James Miller; Eugene D Ungar; Serge Y Landau; John Glendinning
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Time of Grain Supplementation and Social Dominance Modify Feeding Behavior of Heifers in Rotational Grazing Systems.

Authors:  Gabriela Schenato Bica; Luiz Carlos Pinheiro Machado Filho; Dayane Lemos Teixeira; Karolini Tenffen de Sousa; Maria José Hötzel
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-03-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.