Literature DB >> 19094091

Mating-induced neuroendocrine responses during pseudopregnancy in the female mouse.

J J Yang1, C M Larsen, D R Grattan, M S Erskine.   

Abstract

Pseudopregnancy (PSP) is a neuroendocrine reflex triggered by vaginocervical stimulation similar to the neuroendocrine response of early pregnancy and is characterised by short-term neural activity, resulting in long-term neuroendocrine responses that cause repeated release of pituitary prolactin (PRL) over many days. PSP is a useful model to study how somatosensory input is transduced in the brain into neuroendocrine responses, and has been extensively characterised in rats. With increasing use of mice as an experimental model, however, and to allow use of transgenic mice to investigate mechanisms of this sensory response, it is important to characterise the principal neuroendocrine response of pseudopregnancy in this species. The present study aimed to examine the induction and neuroendocrine responses of PSP in mice using vasectomised stud males, to investigate mating-induced changes in vaginal cytology, uterine growth, and PRL secretion, and to map certain aspects of somatosensory transduction by assessing the neural activity marker FOS. Unlike the induction of pseudopregnancy in rats, which can be induced simply by multiple intromissions from a male or artificial mechanical stimulation of the cervix, PSP induction in mice required the receipt of an ejaculation from a male. In mice that received PSP-inducible mating stimuli, FOS expression was observed in a slightly different range of brain regions than has been observed in rats, with increases in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, medial preoptic area, and ventromedial hypothalamus, but not in limbic areas examined. Moreover, PSP mice expressed a single diurnal PRL surge on day 6 of PSP. Thus, the data demonstrate important species differences in the neuroendocrine mechanisms activated in response to a mating stimulus in mice compared with rats. A clear understanding of the species-specific response will be required in interpreting research into the reproductive biology of this species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19094091     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01803.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol        ISSN: 0953-8194            Impact factor:   3.627


  8 in total

1.  Nodal expression in the uterus of the mouse is regulated by the embryo and correlates with implantation.

Authors:  Craig B Park; Daniel Dufort
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  Mating in the absence of fertilization promotes a growth-reproduction versus lifespan trade-off in female mice.

Authors:  Michael Garratt; Heather Try; Kristina O Smiley; David R Grattan; Robert C Brooks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Phenotypic plasticity in genitalia: baculum shape responds to sperm competition risk in house mice.

Authors:  Gonçalo I André; Renée C Firman; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  An experimental test of the ovulatory homolog model of female orgasm.

Authors:  Mihaela Pavlicev; Andreja Moset Zupan; Amanda Barry; Savannah Walters; Kristin M Milano; Harvey J Kliman; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Estrous Cycle Monitoring in Mice with Rapid Data Visualization and Analysis.

Authors:  Leanna K Pantier; Jiang Li; Catherine A Christian
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2019-09-05

6.  Male-derived copulatory plugs enhance implantation success in female Mus musculus.

Authors:  Michael Lough-Stevens; Caleb R Ghione; Matthew Urness; Adelaide Hobbs; Colleen M Sweeney; Matthew D Dean
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.285

7.  Performing vaginal lavage, crystal violet staining, and vaginal cytological evaluation for mouse estrous cycle staging identification.

Authors:  Ashleigh C McLean; Nicolas Valenzuela; Stephen Fai; Steffany A L Bennett
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Sex differences in vocal communication of freely interacting adult mice depend upon behavioral context.

Authors:  Megan R Warren; Morgan S Spurrier; Eric D Roth; Joshua P Neunuebel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.