Literature DB >> 19094009

Brain death revisited: the case for a national standard.

Eun-Kyoung Choi1, Valita Fredland, Carla Zachodni, J Eugene Lammers, Patricia Bledsoe, Paul R Helft.   

Abstract

The concept of brain death--first defined decades ago--still presents medical, ethical, and legal challenges despite its widespread acceptance in clinical practice and in law. This article reviews the medicine, law, and ethics of brain death, including the current inconsistencies in brain death determinations, which a lack of standardized federal policy promotes, and argues that a standard brain death policy to be used by all hospitals in all states should be created.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19094009     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00340.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  5 in total

1.  Renaissance of criticism on the concept of brain death--the role of legal medicine in the context of the interdisciplinary discussion.

Authors:  L Markert; B Bockholdt; M A Verhoff; S Heinze; M Parzeller
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 2.  Controversies in defining and determining death in critical care.

Authors:  James L Bernat
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 42.937

3.  Determination of Death and the Dead Donor Rule: A Survey of the Current Law on Brain Death.

Authors:  Nikolas T Nikas; Dorinda C Bordlee; Madeline Moreira
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2016-04-20

4.  Does the Uniform Determination of Death Act Need to Be Revised?

Authors:  Doyen Nguyen
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2020-06-02

5.  Death in the eyes of the beholder.

Authors:  S Fry-Revere; B Bastani
Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med       Date:  2010
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.