Literature DB >> 19093777

Delivery systems: a vaccine strategy for overcoming mucosal tolerance?

Jamie F S Mann1, Reinaldo Acevedo, Judith Del Campo, Oliver Pérez, Valerie A Ferro.   

Abstract

Antigens administered via the oral and, to a lesser extent, the nasal route are potentially able to invoke tolerance, resulting in a nonreactive immune response. This has been a hurdle for mucosal vaccine development and yet the desire to induce protective local and systemic responses, with pain-free and more convenient products, has been the impetus driving mucosal vaccine R&D. Nevertheless, few mucosal vaccines have reached the marketplace and products are still treated with caution, particularly where live organisms are utilized. In this review, we examine the use of delivery systems with adjuvant properties as key components in a vaccine strategy that does not require the use of live vectors to overcome tolerance and have exemplified their success in mucosal vaccines, concentrating on the nasal and oral routes of administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19093777     DOI: 10.1586/14760584.8.1.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines        ISSN: 1476-0584            Impact factor:   5.217


  17 in total

1.  Poly(anhydride) nanoparticles act as active Th1 adjuvants through Toll-like receptor exploitation.

Authors:  I Tamayo; J M Irache; C Mansilla; J Ochoa-Repáraz; J J Lasarte; C Gamazo
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2010-07-14

Review 2.  Vaccines: the fourth century.

Authors:  Stanley A Plotkin
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2009-09-30

3.  Mucosal immunization with Vibrio cholerae outer membrane vesicles provides maternal protection mediated by antilipopolysaccharide antibodies that inhibit bacterial motility.

Authors:  Anne L Bishop; Stefan Schild; Bharathi Patimalla; Brian Klein; Andrew Camilli
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 4.  Recent advances in oral vaccine development: yeast-derived β-glucan particles.

Authors:  Rebecca De Smet; Liesbeth Allais; Claude A Cuvelier
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Vibrio cholerae: lessons for mucosal vaccine design.

Authors:  Anne L Bishop; Andrew Camilli
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.217

6.  Disruption of antigenic variation is crucial for effective parasite vaccine.

Authors:  Fernando D Rivero; Alicia Saura; Cesar G Prucca; Pedro G Carranza; Alessandro Torri; Hugo D Lujan
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Formulation and evaluation of oral microparticulate ovarian cancer vaccines.

Authors:  Suprita A Tawde; Lipika Chablani; Archana Akalkotkar; Cherilyn D'Souza; Maurizio Chiriva-Internati; Periasamy Selvaraj; Martin J D'Souza
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 8.  Current state and challenges in developing oral vaccines.

Authors:  Julia E Vela Ramirez; Lindsey A Sharpe; Nicholas A Peppas
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 15.470

9.  Immunogenicity of self-adjuvanticity oral vaccine candidate based on use of Bacillus subtilis spore displaying Schistosoma japonicum 26 KDa GST protein.

Authors:  Li Li; Xuchu Hu; Zhongdao Wu; Shiqiu Xiong; Zhenwen Zhou; Xiaoyun Wang; Jin Xu; Fangli Lu; Xinbing Yu
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.289

10.  Lipopolysaccharide modifications of a cholera vaccine candidate based on outer membrane vesicles reduce endotoxicity and reveal the major protective antigen.

Authors:  Deborah R Leitner; Sandra Feichter; Kristina Schild-Prüfert; Gerald N Rechberger; Joachim Reidl; Stefan Schild
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.