Literature DB >> 19093205

Comparing the acid-suppressive effects of three brands of generic lansoprazole with the original: pharmacokinetic bioequivalence tests do not necessarily guarantee pharmacodynamic equivalence.

Tomohiko Shimatani1, Seiko Hirokawa, Yumiko Tawara, Kazuko Hamai, Mutsuko Matsumoto, Susumu Tazuma, Masaki Inoue.   

Abstract

Generic drugs contain the same active ingredient as an original drug and have their bioequivalence proved by pharmacokinetic tests. However, few studies have been reported on whether these bioequivalence studies infer pharmacodynamic equivalence. In this study, in eight healthy Helicobacter pylori-negative CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers, we compared the acid-suppressive effects of repeated administration of 15 mg of three brands of generic lansoprazole, Taiproton, Tapizol, and Lansoral, with those of the original lansoprazole, Takepron. Median intragastric pH value for 24-h and % pH > 4 for daytime (08:00-20:00 h) and night-time were significantly higher with any lansoprazole formulation, compared with the control (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). However, during the daytime, % pH > 4 with Tapizol was significantly lower than the original (P < 0.05). Compared with the original, no significantly larger, but no small range of inter-subject variations were observed in these two parameters for each of the three brands of generic lansoprazole (Bartlett test). Pharmacokinetic bioequivalence tests do not necessarily guarantee pharmacodynamic equivalence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19093205     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-008-0634-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  20 in total

1.  Acid-suppressive effects of rabeprazole, omeprazole, and lansoprazole at reduced and standard doses: a crossover comparative study in homozygous extensive metabolizers of cytochrome P450 2C19.

Authors:  Tomohiko Shimatani; Masaki Inoue; Tomoko Kuroiwa; Jing Xu; Hiroshi Mieno; Masuo Nakamura; Susumu Tazuma
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Lansoprazole 15 and 30 mg daily in maintaining healing and symptom relief in patients with reflux oesophagitis.

Authors:  J G Hatlebakk; A Berstad
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.171

3.  Comparative bioavailability of two enteric-coated capsules of omeprazole in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  S K Garg; Y Chugh; S K Tripathi; N Kumar; P L Sharma
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol       Date:  1993-02

4.  The effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on intragastric pH during dosing with lansoprazole or ranitidine.

Authors:  M A van Herwaarden; M Samsom; C H van Nispen; P G Mulder; A J Smout
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 8.171

5.  The comparative effects of lansoprazole, omeprazole, and ranitidine in suppressing gastric acid secretion.

Authors:  R A Blum; H Shi; M D Karol; P A Greski-Rose; R H Hunt
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.393

6.  Predominant nocturnal acid reflux in patients with Los Angeles grade C and D reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  K Adachi; H Fujishiro; T Katsube; M Yuki; M Ono; A Kawamura; M A Rumi; M Watanabe; Y Kinoshita
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.029

7.  Comparison of lansoprazole and famotidine for gastric acid inhibition during the daytime and night-time in different CYP2C19 genotype groups.

Authors:  N Shirai; T Furuta; F Xiao; M Kajimura; H Hanai; K Ohashi; T Ishizaki
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  Nocturnal recovery of gastric acid secretion with twice-daily dosing of proton pump inhibitors.

Authors:  P L Peghini; P O Katz; N A Bracy; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Lansoprazole versus ranitidine in the maintenance treatment of reflux oesophagitis.

Authors:  A L Gough; R G Long; B T Cooper; C S Fosters; A D Garrett; C H Langworthy
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 8.171

10.  Acid-suppressive effects of generic omeprazole: comparison of three brands of generic omeprazole with original omeprazole.

Authors:  T Shimatani; M Inoue; T Kuroiwa; J Xu; H Mieno; S Tazuma
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 4.088

View more
  3 in total

1.  Calculation of direct antiretroviral treatment costs and potential cost savings by using generics in the German HIV ClinSurv cohort.

Authors:  Matthias Stoll; Christian Kollan; Frank Bergmann; Johannes Bogner; Gerd Faetkenheuer; Carlos Fritzsche; Kirsten Hoeper; Heinz-August Horst; Jan van Lunzen; Andreas Plettenberg; Stefan Reuter; Jürgen Rockstroh; Hans-Jürgen Stellbrink; Osamah Hamouda; Barbara Bartmeyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Vonoprazan versus Lansoprazole for the Initial Treatment of Reflux Esophagitis: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis in Japan.

Authors:  Yasuki Habu
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 1.271

3.  Treatment strategies for reflux esophagitis including a potassium-competitive acid blocker: A cost-effectiveness analysis in Japan.

Authors:  Yasuki Habu; Ryuhei Hamasaki; Motonobu Maruo; Tatsuya Nakagawa; Yuki Aono; Daisaku Hachimine
Journal:  J Gen Fam Med       Date:  2021-02-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.