Literature DB >> 19092520

Children's Perceptions of Healthcare Survey.

Linda Lindeke1, Jayne Fulkerson, Mary Chesney, Lauren Johnson, Kay Savik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few validated pediatric tools exist to directly gather data about children's perceptions of their own healthcare; parent surveys are typically used as proxies. A psychometrically sound, child-focused survey captures children's unique perceptions for quality improvement.
OBJECTIVES: This study developed and evaluated reliability of a survey, assessed score differences by children's age, and compared the responses of children and parents.
METHOD: The Children's Perceptions of Healthcare Survey was developed for inpatient and outpatient quality improvement. Following expert review, the tool was administered to 237 parent-child dyads at the time of discharge from an inpatient pediatric unit (n = 121) and after outpatient clinic visits (n = 116). Responses were analyzed and compared.
RESULTS: Internal consistency reliability for the tool was high (child/adolescents: alpha = .84; parents: alpha = .86), with no significant differences by child age or child gender. Parent and child scores were significantly correlated (r = 0.29, P < .001). About half of parents' scores were higher than their children's scores. DISCUSSION: This tool worked well to collect data from a wide age range of children across healthcare settings. Children's perceptions were unique; involving children in care assessment is worthwhile and captures insights missed when only parents are surveyed. The Children's Perceptions of Healthcare Survey is a valid, psychometrically sound tool to capture children's unique perspectives regarding their healthcare and may be useful for system quality improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19092520     DOI: 10.1097/01.NAQ.0000343345.70666.6d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Adm Q        ISSN: 0363-9568


  1 in total

1.  Eliciting the experiences of the adolescent-parent dyad following critical care admission: a pilot study.

Authors:  Dora Wood; Sophie Geoghegan; Padmanabhan Ramnarayan; Peter J Davis; John V Pappachan; Sarah Goodwin; Jo Wray
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.183

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.