Literature DB >> 19092339

Sentinel node tumor burden according to the Rotterdam criteria is the most important prognostic factor for survival in melanoma patients: a multicenter study in 388 patients with positive sentinel nodes.

Alexander C J van Akkooi1, Zbigniew I Nowecki, Christiane Voit, Gregor Schäfer-Hesterberg, Wanda Michej, Johannes H W de Wilt, Piotr Rutkowski, Cornelis Verhoef, Alexander M M Eggermont.   

Abstract

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The more intensive sentinel node (SN) pathologic workup, the higher the SN-positivity rate. This is characterized by an increased detection of cases with minimal tumor burden (SUB-micrometastasis <0.1 mm), which represents different biology.
METHODS: The slides of positive SN from 3 major centers within the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Melanoma Group were reviewed and classified according to the Rotterdam Classification of SN Tumor Burden (<0.1 mm; 0.1-1 mm; >1 mm) maximum diameter of the largest metastasis. The predictive value for additional nodal metastases in the completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and disease outcome as disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was calculated.
RESULTS: In 388 SN positive patients, with primary melanoma, median Breslow thickness was 4.00 mm; ulceration was present in 56%. Forty patients (10%) had metastases <0.1 mm. Additional nodal positivity was found in only 1 of 40 patients (3%). At a mean follow-up of 41 months, estimated OS at 5 years was 91% for metastasis <0.1 mm, 61% for 0.1 to 1.0 mm, and 51% for >1.0 mm (P < 0.001). SN tumor burden increased significantly with tumor thickness. When the cut-off value for SUB-micrometastases was taken at <0.2 mm (such as in breast cancer), the survival was 89%, and 10% had additional non-SN nodal positivity.
CONCLUSION: This large multicenter dataset establishes that patients with SUB-micrometastases <0.1 mm have the same prognosis as SN negative patients and can be spared a CLND. A <0.2 mm cut-off for SUB-micrometastases does not seem correct for melanoma, as 10% additional nodal positivity is found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19092339     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818fefe0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  45 in total

1.  EANM practice guidelines for lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma.

Authors:  Christina Bluemel; Ken Herrmann; Francesco Giammarile; Omgo E Nieweg; Julien Dubreuil; Alessandro Testori; Riccardo A Audisio; Odysseas Zoras; Michael Lassmann; Annette H Chakera; Roger Uren; Sotirios Chondrogiannis; Patrick M Colletti; Domenico Rubello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Lymph node dissection for melanoma: where do we stand?

Authors:  Madalyn G Neuwirth; Edmund K Bartlett; Giorgos C Karakousis
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2017-03-03

3.  Is histopathological overdiagnosis of melanoma a good insurance for the future?

Authors:  Gerardo Ferrara; Iris Zalaudek
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2015-02

Review 4.  Surgical treatment of melanoma patients with early sentinel node involvement.

Authors:  Rosemarie E Hardin; Julie R Lange
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2012-09

Review 5.  Predicting the outcome of melanoma: can we tell the future of a patient's melanoma?

Authors:  Oriol Yélamos; Pedram Gerami
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2015-08-10

6.  Clinicopathological Features, Staging, and Current Approaches to Treatment in High-Risk Resectable Melanoma.

Authors:  Emily Z Keung; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Significance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in malignant melanoma: overview of international data.

Authors:  Yoichi Moroi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Survival and the sentinel lymph node in melanoma.

Authors:  Mark Faries
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Multimarker reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay in lymphatic drainage and sentinel node tumor burden.

Authors:  Piotr Rutkowski; Zbigniew I Nowecki; Alexander C J van Akkooi; Jadwiga Kulik; Michej Wanda; Janusz A Siedlecki; Alexander M M Eggermont; Wlodzimierz Ruka
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Potential cost-effectiveness of US-guided FNAC in melanoma patients as a primary procedure and in follow-up.

Authors:  Alexander C J van Akkooi; Christiane A Voit; Cornelis Verhoef; Alexander M M Eggermont
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.