OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of pharmacological preconditioning with a volatile anesthetic in patients undergoing liver resection with inflow occlusion. BACKGROUND: In liver surgery, ischemic preconditioning and intermittent clamping are the only established protective strategies to reduce tissue damage due to ischemia during inflow occlusion. Preconditioning with volatile anesthetics has provided protection against cardiac and renal ischemic injury in several animal models through NO and HO-1 pathways. But pharmacological preconditioning has never been tested in patients undergoing liver surgery in a randomized trial. METHODS:Sixty-four patients undergoing liver surgery with inflow occlusion were randomized intraoperatively for preconditioning with sevoflurane or not (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00516711). Anesthesia was performed intravenously with propofol. Thirty minutes before inflow occlusion propofol was replaced by sevoflurane in the preconditioning group. Primary endpoint was postoperative liver injury assessed by peak values of liver transaminases. Postoperative complications were recorded according to an established scoring system. RESULTS:Sevoflurane preconditioning significantly limited the postoperative increase of serum transaminase levels by 261 U/L (95% CI, 65 to 458; P = 0.01) for the ALT and by 239 (95% CI, -2 to 480; P = 0.05) for the AST corresponding to decreases of baseline levels of 35% and 31%, respectively. Patients with steatosis had an even better benefit than patients without steatosis. The rates of any complication (risk ratio 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.85; P = 0.006) and of severe complications requiring invasive procedures (risk ratio 0.25; 95% CI, 0.06 to 1.08; P = 0.05) were also lowered by preconditioning. CONCLUSION: This first randomized trial of pharmacological preconditioning in liver surgery in humans showed a protective effect of preconditioning with volatile anesthetics. This strategy may provide a new and easily applicable therapeutic option to protect the liver and to lower complication rates.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of pharmacological preconditioning with a volatile anesthetic in patients undergoing liver resection with inflow occlusion. BACKGROUND: In liver surgery, ischemic preconditioning and intermittent clamping are the only established protective strategies to reduce tissue damage due to ischemia during inflow occlusion. Preconditioning with volatile anesthetics has provided protection against cardiac and renal ischemic injury in several animal models through NO and HO-1 pathways. But pharmacological preconditioning has never been tested in patients undergoing liver surgery in a randomized trial. METHODS: Sixty-four patients undergoing liver surgery with inflow occlusion were randomized intraoperatively for preconditioning with sevoflurane or not (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00516711). Anesthesia was performed intravenously with propofol. Thirty minutes before inflow occlusion propofol was replaced by sevoflurane in the preconditioning group. Primary endpoint was postoperative liver injury assessed by peak values of liver transaminases. Postoperative complications were recorded according to an established scoring system. RESULTS:Sevoflurane preconditioning significantly limited the postoperative increase of serum transaminase levels by 261 U/L (95% CI, 65 to 458; P = 0.01) for the ALT and by 239 (95% CI, -2 to 480; P = 0.05) for the AST corresponding to decreases of baseline levels of 35% and 31%, respectively. Patients with steatosis had an even better benefit than patients without steatosis. The rates of any complication (risk ratio 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.85; P = 0.006) and of severe complications requiring invasive procedures (risk ratio 0.25; 95% CI, 0.06 to 1.08; P = 0.05) were also lowered by preconditioning. CONCLUSION: This first randomized trial of pharmacological preconditioning in liver surgery in humans showed a protective effect of preconditioning with volatile anesthetics. This strategy may provide a new and easily applicable therapeutic option to protect the liver and to lower complication rates.
Authors: Patrick Stoll; Christian I Schwer; Ulrich Goebel; Hartmut Buerkle; Alexander Hoetzel; Rene Schmidt Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Mathilde Steenks; Mark C P M van Baal; Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs; Menno T de Bruijn; Marc Schiesser; Mike H Teo; Tom Callahan; Rob T A Padbury; Greg J Barritt Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Mahmoud Abu-Amara; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; George Glantzounis; Barry Fuller; Brian R Davidson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2009-10-07