Literature DB >> 19091684

Critical superparamagnetic/single-domain grain sizes in interacting magnetite particles: implications for magnetosome crystals.

Adrian R Muxworthy1, Wyn Williams.   

Abstract

Magnetotactic bacteria contain chains of magnetically interacting crystals (magnetosome crystals), which they use for navigation (magnetotaxis). To improve magnetotaxis efficiency, the magnetosome crystals (usually magnetite or greigite in composition) should be magnetically stable single-domain (SSD) particles. Smaller single-domain particles become magnetically unstable owing to thermal fluctuations and are termed superparamagnetic (SP). Previous calculations for the SSD/SP threshold size or blocking volume did not include the contribution of magnetic interactions. In this study, the blocking volume has been calculated as a function of grain elongation and separation for chains of identical magnetite grains. The inclusion of magnetic interactions was found to decrease the blocking volume, thereby increasing the range of SSD behaviour. Combining the results with previously published calculations for the SSD to multidomain threshold size in chains of magnetite reveals that interactions significantly increase the SSD range. We argue that chains of interacting magnetosome crystals found in magnetotactic bacteria have used this effect to improve magnetotaxis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19091684      PMCID: PMC2817151          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  5 in total

Review 1.  Magnetosome formation in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Dennis A Bazylinski; Richard B Frankel
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Habits of magnetosome crystals in coccoid magnetotactic bacteria.

Authors:  Ulysses Lins; Martha R McCartney; Marcos Farina; Richard B Frankel; Peter R Buseck
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Gigantism in unique biogenic magnetite at the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum.

Authors:  Dirk Schumann; Timothy D Raub; Robert E Kopp; Jean-Luc Guerquin-Kern; Ting-Di Wu; Isabelle Rouiller; Aleksey V Smirnov; S Kelly Sears; Uwe Lücken; Sonia M Tikoo; Reinhard Hesse; Joseph L Kirschvink; Hojatollah Vali
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Elongated prismatic magnetite crystals in ALH84001 carbonate globules: potential Martian magnetofossils.

Authors:  K L Thomas-Keprta; D A Bazylinski; J L Kirschvink; S J Clemett; D S McKay; S J Wentworth; H Vali; E K Gibson; C S Romanek
Journal:  Geochim Cosmochim Acta       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.010

5.  Magnetosomal matrix: ultrafine structure may template biomineralization of magnetosomes.

Authors:  A P Taylor; J C Barry
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.758

  5 in total
  24 in total

1.  Development of cellular magnetic dipoles in magnetotactic bacteria.

Authors:  Damien Faivre; Anna Fischer; Inés Garcia-Rubio; Giovanni Mastrogiacomo; Andreas U Gehring
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Magnetically induced behaviour of ferritin corpuscles in avian ears: can cuticulosomes function as magnetosomes?

Authors:  Petr Jandacka; Hynek Burda; Jaromir Pistora
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Bacterial Magnetosome: A Novel Biogenetic Magnetic Targeted Drug Carrier with Potential Multifunctions.

Authors:  Jianbo Sun; Ying Li; Xing-Jie Liang; Paul C Wang
Journal:  J Nanomater       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.986

4.  Hypothetical superparamagnetic magnetometer in a pigeon's upper beak probably does not work.

Authors:  Petr Jandačka; Petr Alexa; Jaromír Pištora; Jana Trojková
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 1.890

5.  Chemical signature of magnetotactic bacteria.

Authors:  Matthieu Amor; Vincent Busigny; Mickaël Durand-Dubief; Mickaël Tharaud; Georges Ona-Nguema; Alexandre Gélabert; Edouard Alphandéry; Nicolas Menguy; Marc F Benedetti; Imène Chebbi; François Guyot
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Anisotropy of bullet-shaped magnetite nanoparticles in the magnetotactic bacteria Desulfovibrio magneticus sp. Strain RS-1.

Authors:  Michalis Chariaou; Lilah Rahn-Lee; Jessica Kind; Inés García-Rubio; Arash Komeili; Andreas U Gehring
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Secondary magnetite in ancient zircon precludes analysis of a Hadean geodynamo.

Authors:  Fengzai Tang; Richard J M Taylor; Josh F Einsle; Cauê S Borlina; Roger R Fu; Benjamin P Weiss; Helen M Williams; Wyn Williams; Lesleis Nagy; Paul A Midgley; Eduardo A Lima; Elizabeth A Bell; T Mark Harrison; Ellen W Alexander; Richard J Harrison
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Magnetoreception in eusocial insects: an update.

Authors:  Eliane Wajnberg; Daniel Acosta-Avalos; Odivaldo Cambraia Alves; Jandira Ferreira de Oliveira; Robert B Srygley; Darci M S Esquivel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Genetic Encoding of Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agents for Tumor Imaging.

Authors:  Simone Schuerle; Maiko Furubayashi; Ava P Soleimany; Tinotenda Gwisai; Wei Huang; Christopher Voigt; Sangeeta N Bhatia
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.110

10.  Numerical tests of magnetoreception models assisted with behavioral experiments on American cockroaches.

Authors:  Kai Sheng Lee; Rainer Dumke; Tomasz Paterek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.